Re: (Possible) bug in the way we track the mergeinfo property

2011-07-15 Thread Paul Burba
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote: > On Thursday 14 July 2011 09:18 PM, Paul Burba wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am in the process of writing a script which would check for the >>> mergeinfo >>> of

Re: (Possible) bug in the way we track the mergeinfo property

2011-07-15 Thread Prabhu Gnana Sundar
On Thursday 14 July 2011 09:18 PM, Paul Burba wrote: On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote: Hi all, I am in the process of writing a script which would check for the mergeinfo of a path and see if the path is present through all the revisions mentioned in the mergeinfo p

RE: (Possible) bug in the way we track the mergeinfo property

2011-07-14 Thread Kamesh Jayachandran
record the mergeinfo as per the outcome of location segments report. With regards Kamesh Jayachandran -Original Message- From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com] Sent: Thu 7/14/2011 9:18 PM To: Prabhu Gnana Sundar Ponnarasu Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: (Possible) bug in

Re: (Possible) bug in the way we track the mergeinfo property

2011-07-14 Thread Paul Burba
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote: > Hi all, > > I am in the process of writing a script which would check for the mergeinfo > of a path and see if the path is present through all the revisions mentioned > in the mergeinfo property. If the path was not found for any revis

(Possible) bug in the way we track the mergeinfo property

2011-07-14 Thread Prabhu Gnana Sundar
Hi all, I am in the process of writing a script which would check for the mergeinfo of a path and see if the path is present through all the revisions mentioned in the mergeinfo property. If the path was not found for any revision range then the script would suggest(as of now) a better way to