Re: "BASE != HEAD" notifications

2014-06-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:21:49 +0200: > On 23.06.2014 10:54, Julian Foad wrote: > > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > >> One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after > >> finishing it. Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before > >> starting > >>

Re: "BASE != HEAD" notifications

2014-06-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:54:46 +0100: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after > > finishing it.  Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before starting > > to edit a file, and later got conflicts > > > > Both

Re: "BASE != HEAD" notifications

2014-06-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 00:59:33 +0200: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:06:22AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after > > finishing it. Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before starting > > to edit a fil

Re: "BASE != HEAD" notifications

2014-06-23 Thread Neels Hofmeyr
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:06:22AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after > finishing it. Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before starting > to edit a file, and later got conflicts Just a "dumb" question from the off... t

Re: "BASE != HEAD" notifications

2014-06-23 Thread Branko Čibej
On 23.06.2014 10:54, Julian Foad wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after >> finishing it. Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before starting >> to edit a file, and later got conflicts >> >> Both of these user errors migh

Re: "BASE != HEAD" notifications

2014-06-23 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Shahaf wrote: > One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after > finishing it.  Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before starting > to edit a file, and later got conflicts > > Both of these user errors might have been prevented if their client had > adv

"BASE != HEAD" notifications

2014-06-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after finishing it. Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before starting to edit a file, and later got conflicts Both of these user errors might have been prevented if their client had advised them (during the bisect, for