Passing an invalid URL to svn co causes an abort and core dump. This
fails with all protocols
http, svn, file. It occurs with all versions I tested (1.7.5, 1.7.11,
1.7.12, 1.8.1, and the now defunct 1.8.2)
It occurs with multiple subcommand (ls, info, etc.) It happens on both
unix and windows
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:11 PM, wrote:
> > > I agree that force-http10 is not good name and semantic. Actually
> > > these proxies is not busted: it's allowed to HTTP/1.1 proxies to
> > > require content-length if they want. And strictly speaking proxies
may
> > > have different behavior for d
> > I agree that force-http10 is not good name and semantic. Actually
> > these proxies is not busted: it's allowed to HTTP/1.1 proxies to
> > require content-length if they want. And strictly speaking proxies may
> > have different behavior for different requests.
>
> From *our* standpoint, they
> > On Jun 21, 2013 10:36 AM, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
> > >
> > > >> Problem with this approach that some servers may support HTTP/1.1
> > > >> partially. I.e. declare them as HTTP/1.1 but do not support
chunked
> > > >> Transfer-Encoding.
> > > >
> > > > Then fix that problem. Add a flag saying
> On Jun 21, 2013 10:36 AM, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
> >
> > >> Problem with this approach that some servers may support HTTP/1.1
> > >> partially. I.e. declare them as HTTP/1.1 but do not support chunked
> > >> Transfer-Encoding.
> > >
> > > Then fix that problem. Add a flag saying "busted_http11
> Did you read my email above? Let me explain again. Server advertises
> supported authentication schemes, for example Microsoft IIS:
> [[[
> C: GET / HTTP/1.1
> S: HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required
> S: WWW-Authenticate: NTLM
> S: WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate
> S: WWW-Authenticate: Basic
> ]]]
>
> > Nor should you even try to, IMO. There comes a time when it ceases to
> > make any sense to support an old compiler that's been EOL-d a while
ago,
> > especially since free versions of newer compilers are available.
> >
> > I would support removing the .dsp generator completely.
>
> +1, it's
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote on 11/30/2012 03:53:45 PM:
> Ben Reser :
> > This is really a philosophical difference between a centralized
> > version control system and DVCS.
>
> No, no, no. If you think that's true, I have failed to communicate.
>
> I'm not handwaving about philosophy. I'm pointing
> From: Philip Martin
> kmra...@rockwellcollins.com writes:
>
> > *one* of my servers currently logs around 10GB per week with neon
> > only access. I'd probably have to change from rotating logs
> > weekly to rotating logs hourly! Disabling logging is not an option.
>
> It depends what sort o
> Greg Stein writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
> > wrote:
> >>...
> >> Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
> >> increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than
older
> >> servers, about 50% fewer requests on checkout, bu
Daniel Shahaf wrote on 06/21/2012 12:57:46 PM:
> > > > Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable
building
> > > > mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing
> > httpd.h,
> > > > error, so I pointed it to my local build of httpd as a workaround.
> > > >
> >
> From: Daniel Shahaf
> > Also, specifying --without-apxs does not correctly disable building
> > mod_dav_svn and mod_dontdothat. The build fails with a missing
httpd.h,
> > error, so I pointed it to my local build of httpd as a workaround.
> >
>
> httpd 2.2 or 2.4?
I pointed it to 2.2.22 as
> Philip and I were just chatting about the 1.8 release and where we are
> on that. For a thought experiment, we asked, "can we ship trunk
> today?" The answer was "no" for three specific items:
>
> * local moves are kinda broken (thus: fix or roll back)
> * svnrdump does not work over ra_serf (mo
> On 06/20/2012 10:22 PM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> > Dmitry Pavlenko wrote on 06/20/2012 11:14:58
AM:
> >> simple_providers.c (svn_auth__simple_creds_cache_get): I propose to
> >> drop all assignments
> >> "need_to_save = FALSE" except the initial one; otherwise assignment
> >> to FAL
Dmitry Pavlenko wrote on 06/20/2012 11:14:58 AM:
> simple_providers.c (svn_auth__simple_creds_cache_get): I propose to
> drop all assignments
> "need_to_save = FALSE" except the initial one; otherwise assignment
> to FALSE may override existing
> TRUE value. This may happen if default_username
Mark Phippard wrote on 06/06/2012 10:18:52 AM:
> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Mark Phippard
wrote:
> >> Keep in mind that this is not about server load, they are looking at
> >> this from bandwidth. So a cache in front of the server would not
help
> >> them at all. Eclipse.org has a 10MB
Mark Mielke wrote on 01/05/2012 12:36:10 PM:
> On 01/05/2012 12:34 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 05.01.2012 18:25, Mark Mielke wrote:
> >> On 01/05/2012 12:04 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >>> Ha, but svn:author currently fills that role. So why add another
> >>> property?
> >> If svn:author is defin
Greg Stein wrote on 07/20/2011 12:32:42 PM:
> > Somewhat off-topic, but there was also previous concern that
> > the multiple connections that serf uses might overly stress some
> > larger servers. Do we have any idea how many additional connections
> > a typical server would see? For example, i
> From: Greg Stein
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:23, wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on 07/19/2011 06:53:12 PM:
> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:41, C. Michael Pilato
> >> wrote:
> >> >...
> >> > release-readiness? What about ra_serf's "default-ness" -- is it
in the
> >> > appropriate state base
Greg Stein wrote on 07/19/2011 06:53:12 PM:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:41, C. Michael Pilato
wrote:
> >...
> > release-readiness? What about ra_serf's "default-ness" -- is it in
the
> > appropriate state based on that library's readiness at this moment?
>
> The only pending serf issue is m
Stefan Sperling wrote on 07/14/2011 08:40:29 AM:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 08:17:07AM -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
wrote:
> > Julian Foad wrote on 07/14/2011 06:58:24
AM:
> > > The attached patch makes some improvements to how we report that the
WC
> > > is locked or busy (the 'run clean
Julian Foad wrote on 07/14/2011 06:58:24 AM:
> The attached patch makes some improvements to how we report that the WC
> is locked or busy (the 'run cleanup' messages). I need a sanity check
> to make sure I've understood the relationship between how we want to
> handle 'the work queue is busy' a
Philip Martin wrote on 06/30/2011 01:54:15
PM:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> >> Or asked a different way, does a new commit update the revprop.db or
> >> does it just create files like 1.6 did and things are only added
> >> to the db during svnadmin pack...
> >
> > The latter.
>
> "Only" is wron
Daniel Shahaf wrote on 06/30/2011 01:41:51 PM:
> > >> The reason SQLite was used is that rev props can be edited via svn
> > >> prop*--revprop
> > >>
> > >> So you could also disable the pre-revprop-change hook during a
backup
> > >> and that should make you safe. And if you have not enabled it
Mark Phippard wrote on 06/30/2011 01:08:52 PM:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> > You can't currently pack revision shards unless you also pack revprop
> > shards. (but that's easy to change)
>
> FWIW, that was my assumption. I do not personally think that is a big
>
Philip Martin wrote on 06/30/2011 12:43:54
PM:
> >> - since 1.6, if FSFS rep-sharing is not disabled there is the
problem
> >>of copying the rep-sharing SQLite database.
> >
> > rep-cache.db? I thought that could be easily regenerated. Is there
> > another .db file I missed?
>
> Yes, rep
Philip Martin wrote on 06/30/2011 11:53:54
AM:
> > I know using traditional server backup software has never been
> > recommended on fsfs repositories. However, since the server
> > never rewrote any files after the transaction was finalized, the
> > only previous issues with using a snapshot ba
[This thread was originally started on the users list.
A snippet is attached below for reference.
Daniel encouraged me to bring it to the dev list.]
I know using traditional server backup software has never been
recommended on fsfs repositories. However, since the server
never rewrote any files
Ivan Zhakov wrote on 06/24/2011 10:46:37 AM:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 17:48, wrote:
> >
> > Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication? I can't get it
to
> > work with a 1.6.5 server using mod_auth_kerb and negotiate.
> >
> > The server sends the 401:
> >
> > WWW-Authenticate: Negoti
Stefan Küng wrote on 06/24/2011 09:04:41 AM:
> On 24.06.2011 15:50, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
> >
> >> Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication? I can't get it
to
> >> work with a 1.6.5 server using mod_auth_kerb and negotiate.
> >>
> >> The ser
Stefan Sperling wrote on 06/24/2011 09:02:15 AM:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 08:55:02AM -0500, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com
wrote:
> > Not sure, but I know serf shouldn't keep sending the same endless
> > unauthenticated request until I control-C the command. No indication
> > it was even doing any
Mark Phippard wrote on 06/24/2011 08:50:22 AM:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
>
> > Is anybody using serf with negotiate authentication? I can't get it
to
> > work with a 1.6.5 server using mod_auth_kerb and negotiate.
> >
> > The server sends the 401:
> >
> > WWW-Authenticate: Neg
Stefan Sperling wrote on 06/24/2011 08:06:28 AM:
> Subject: should we really ship serf as default for 1.7? (was: Re:
> serf and sourceforge.net don't get along)
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:17:37PM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > On 06/22/2011 07:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > Bolstridg
Johan Corveleyn wrote on 06/21/2011 03:01:31 PM:
[snip]
> > Max_Path is 256 chars excluding drive part. Max path for unicode
> > version of API is 32,767 when using path with "\\?\" style. I think
> > cmd should be able to work with \\?\ .
> >
> > Ref: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa3
Paul Burba wrote on 03/02/2011 10:10:40 AM:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
> > On 03/02/2011 10:40 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> >> "C. Michael Pilato" wrote on 01/28/2011
01:44:26 PM:
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for issue #3789 log -g regression in
"C. Michael Pilato" wrote on 01/28/2011 01:44:26 PM:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for issue #3789 log -g regression in r1028108
>
> On 01/26/2011 05:59 PM, Kevin Radke wrote:
> > This also needs a back-port to the 1.6.x branch.
> >
> > [[[
> >Fix issue #3789: Correctly ignore missing locations
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> > Hello folks: I'd like to cut 1.6.16 next Wednesday. Please nominate /
> > review / vote / etc in the mean time.
>
> Hopefully this isn't dashing too many hopes, but I'm running out of
> tuits this week, and it appears folks still have
anatoly techtonik wrote on 09/20/2010 05:16:18 AM:
> I can't find any binaries for Python bindings for Windows. Previously
> they were available from tigris.org site, but now there aren't any
> updates. It will greatly reduce frustration for users of hgsubversion
> and other Windows tools if up t
When debugging some repository performance problems, I narrowed it
down to repositories with large numbers of locked files. For example,
if I do an "svn ls -v http://server/repo/path"; on a repository with
26k locked files, the server generates an 11MB xml response
that included lock information a
Mark Phippard wrote on 02/19/2010 09:32:23 AM:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:43 AM, wrote:
>
> > Good to hear. I know the TortoiseSVN devs are not using the dev svn
> > branch
> > currently because of the previous huge performance issues they saw in
> > the past. Sounds like it might be time t
> > > What platform were these test executed on? We need to make sure
> > > windows platforms are just as zippy.
> >
> > I tested on Debian stable. I don't currently build on Windows, but
> > all the code I used is in my first email so you should be able to
> > reproduce it if you want. I do ha
Greg Stein wrote on 02/18/2010 03:31:19 PM:
> Awesome work! We've just been assuming/hoping it would be fast enough,
> and would resolve any problems "later". It is good to see we're in the
> right ballpark.
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:21, Philip Martin mar...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> > How fas
Phillip Hellewell wrote on 02/10/2010 09:11:40 AM:
> > The '3 seconds delay' is most likely caused by the slow opening of
HTTP
> > sessions which walk up the repository to find the repository root.This
case
> > is already fixed in HTTPv2. (svn:// is much faster than this. And
svn+ssh://
> > dep
justin.erenkra...@gmail.com wrote on 02/09/2010 12:11:04 PM:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:05 AM, wrote:
> > news wrote on 02/09/2010 01:02:52 AM:
> >>
> >> 'getting subversion' still lists the 'tigris.org' windows binaries
> >> that were provided by D.J. Heap.
> >> But they are stuck at 1.6.6 and
news wrote on 02/09/2010 01:02:52 AM:
>
> 'getting subversion' still lists the 'tigris.org' windows binaries
> that were provided by D.J. Heap.
> But they are stuck at 1.6.6 and as D.J. stated in
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?
> dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2423180
>
> he won'
"Hyrum K. Wright" wrote on 01/12/2010
04:52:33 PM:
> After pulling 1.6.7 due to a segfault regression, we've rerolled the
> branch as Subversion 1.6.8. The magic revision is r898464, and you
> can find the tarballs here:
>
> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.8/
>
> Please be sure to tes
Magnus Torfason wrote on 01/11/2010 01:39:18 PM:
> After some further exploration, I have an update on my issue with svn up
> failing on my svn-externals-infested repository. Below, I report an
> alternative workaround, and the output of ps while doing the update.
>
> On 1/11/2010 11:53 AM, M
Julian Foad wrote on 01/06/2010 10:16:55 AM:
> Greg Hudson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:31 -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > > "To be a compelling replacement for git/Mercurial", perhaps?
> >
> > That seems tough.
>
> Heh. A vision that's simple to attain is hardly a vision.
I person
Is there a reason the get lock report does not support a "depth"
concept and just reports all locks "at or below" the specified
path?
I noticed on a large repository with a large number of
locks, this report can be many megabytes worth of
(worthless) network transmitted data when doing a
simple no
49 matches
Mail list logo
