On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >
> > Stating that equivalent-case are treated as equal states that the
> > code points "A"-"Z" are all treated as equal, and "a"-"z" are all
> > treated as equal (and "A" and "a" would be treated as unique
> > of one another) LOL
>
> I gues
Which public API, APR's or svn's?
On Dec 10, 2015 11:24 AM, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
> On 10 December 2015 at 20:20, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> On 10 December 2015 at 19:14, Julian Foad
> wrote:
> >>> APR devs, Subversion devs:
> >>>
> >>> On Subversion's Mac OS buildbots it ap
Looks great, thanks Brane, and Bert for calling this out.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:43 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 17.06.2015 15:53, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> Thanks for the reminder! Will do.
> On 17 Jun 2015 12:37 pm, "Yann Ylavic" wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Branko Čibej wr
Great report, thanks Bert. I'll review.
Bill
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Trying yet another e-mail address... Nice that this just bounces instead
> of being moderated :(
>
> Bert
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:rhuij...@collab.
On Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:44:52 +0100
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:05 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:05 +0100
> > "Bert Huijben" wrote:
> >
> > > I think the dll load function should be converted
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:05 +0100
"Bert Huijben" wrote:
> I think the dll load function should be converted to a more stable
> pattern, that properly handles multiple threads. And perhaps we
> should just assume a few more NT functions to be alsways there
> instead of loading them dynamically.
T
sponse' to that
particular cve.
-Original message-
From: Mark Thomas
To: Hyrum K Wright , "William A. Rowe Jr."
, secur...@apache.org, dev@subversion.apache.org
Sent: Sun, May 20, 2012 15:49:56 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1339559 -
/subversion/site/publish/d
On 5/18/2012 11:57 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> ...
>> CVE are meant to be a unique identifier to an issue so I think it's
>> a (minor?) problem if different downstreamers requests CVE's
>> independently.
>> ...
>> IOW, "Should we be trigger-h
On 1/19/2010 5:19 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> The patch was written on the 1.4.x branch but I svn switch'ed it to trunk for
> easy application.
I would suggest one bit of alternate code that is a bit more condensed, any
concern?;
+static int same_drive(const char *path1, const char *path2)
+{
+
On 1/7/2010 9:12 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> Looking at apr's 1.3.x branch:
>
> In r817810 a change to the hash table implementation was introduced,
> which moves the data of a hash table from the main pool to a subpool (as
> seen from the pool passed to apr_hash_make). This makes the contents of
On 1/7/2010 6:06 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:26 +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> This sounds like a valid point.
>
> +1
>
>> I would propose to revert r817810 / r817809 (for 1.3.x / 1.4.x) and
>> only keep r817806 (trunk). Graham?
>> IMHO we can backport this again later if
On 1/17/2010 4:57 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/7/2010 9:12 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>> Looking at apr's 1.3.x branch:
>>
>> In r817810 a change to the hash table implementation was introduced,
>> which moves the data of a hash table from the main
12 matches
Mail list logo
