Re: Roadmap development

2010-05-05 Thread Vadim Chekan
Roadmap's WC-NG leads to an issue with broken link. Vadim

Re: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal

2010-04-10 Thread Vadim Chekan
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 00:18, Alexey Neyman wrote: >> Have you looked at pre-commit hooks that may serve that purpose? I think >> svnperms.py may be what you're looking for - just disallow all operations >> except additions on 'tags/*', and dis

Re: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal

2010-04-10 Thread Vadim Chekan
> Alexey. > > On Friday 09 April 2010 05:56:44 pm Vadim Chekan wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:31 AM, B Smith-Mannschott >> >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:13, Vadim Chekan wrote: >> >> P.S. Plase, introduce true tags, no more "

Re: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal

2010-04-09 Thread Vadim Chekan
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:31 AM, B Smith-Mannschott wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:13, Vadim Chekan wrote: >> P.S. Plase, introduce true tags, no more "lets pretend this copy is a >> tag". > > What's a "true" tag? What's it good for?

Re: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal

2010-04-09 Thread Vadim Chekan
Thanks for great overview Michael, I am playing with dvcs and "d" is not the point. Even if we will adopt dvcs, it will be configured in centralized fashion. What attracts me is: 1. ability to create a branch locally in <5sec (big project) and never expose it. I could do branches even for code r

Re: Unit test

2010-02-24 Thread Vadim Chekan
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > Most of the tests default to the FSFS backend, to get fs-test to use > the BDB backend you need to use > >  $ ./fs-test --fs-type=bdb Thanks Philip, I'll give it a try tonight. Vadim.

Unit test

2010-02-23 Thread Vadim Chekan
Hi all, I'm working on a patch for svn but I'm not sure either it passes unit tests. When I run it as "make bdbcheck", fs-test fails test #23: create and modify medium file. But when I "cd subversion/tests/libsvn_fs && fs-test", then it passes all rules (well, with one18th XFAIL). So the question

Re: Bdb strings anomaly

2010-01-12 Thread Vadim Chekan
, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Vadim Chekan wrote: > Yes, I'll try to figure it out. Just wanted to make sure that it > wasn't intentional for whatever reason. > I've already looked up strings bdb implementation and could not see > anything suspicious. Now it's time for debugger

Re: Bdb strings anomaly

2009-12-22 Thread Vadim Chekan
's still just the 1 additional empty row.  THAT > SAID, it does certainly seem inefficient. > > Wanna dive into the code and work up a patch? > > > Vadim Chekan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Out of curiosity I wrote a script which dumps subversion bdb tables >>

Bdb strings anomaly

2009-12-22 Thread Vadim Chekan
Hi all, Out of curiosity I wrote a script which dumps subversion bdb tables and found interesting anomaly in "strings" table. Every string there has a duplicate with empty value. It is my understanding that "strings" allows duplicates to store very large content in chunks under the same key. That'