RE: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2012-05-15 Thread Moe, Mark
> I rewrote some parts of the commit processing on trunk last week, which > should have a positive effect on the use cases reported in this thread. > Is it possible for somebody to see what the performance difference on NFS > is? Does this include Phillip's patch (http://subversion.tigris.org/is

RE: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2012-05-04 Thread Moe, Mark
> Well... your interest has already been noted :-) Maybe you're asking > how you can help get the bug fixed? Volunteering, of course (as we all > are). ... > If you're not talking about digging into the code yourself, then... I > dunno. Maybe one of the Subversion vendors is willing to do spot f

RE: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2012-05-04 Thread Moe, Mark
To: Moe, Mark Cc: Daniel Shahaf; dev@subversion.apache.org; Braun, Eric Subject: Re: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies "Moe, Mark" writes: > Can this patch be marked as an issue or enhancement idea? I've raised http://subversion.tigris.org/issu

RE: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2012-05-03 Thread Moe, Mark
ay 01, 2012 2:34 PM To: Daniel Shahaf Cc: Moe, Mark; dev@subversion.apache.org; Braun, Eric Subject: Re: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies Philip Martin writes: > Daniel Shahaf writes: > >> What patch are you talking about? I don't recall seeing a

subscribe

2012-05-02 Thread Moe, Mark
subscribe [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure un

RE: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2012-05-01 Thread Moe, Mark
> I don't really know how to proceed. The performance gains are huge > on NFS and it's hard to see any other way to fix the 1.7 regression. > We could sacrifice concurrency for performance and enable it all the > time, essentially deciding that this is the way that WCNG will use > SQLite. I don't

RE: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2012-05-01 Thread Moe, Mark
Behalf Of Philip Martin Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 3:19 AM To: Moe, Mark Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies Mark Moe writes: > This is a big deal for us too. Will there be a configuration setting in an > official svn