Re: svn: E120171: Error running context: An error occurred during SSL communication

2025-04-29 Thread Michael Osipov
On 2025/04/29 08:29:59 Andreas Stieger wrote: > > On 2025-04-29 10:00, Michael Osipov wrote: > > On 2025/04/27 13:00:53 Graham Leggett via dev wrote: > > > > What mechanism exists to get the error that occurred during SSL > > communication? > > > > [...]

Re: svn: E120171: Error running context: An error occurred during SSL communication

2025-04-29 Thread Michael Osipov
On 2025/04/27 13:00:53 Graham Leggett via dev wrote: > Hi all, > > When attempting a routine svn update from svn 1.14.3 on MacOS (via macports), > I'm getting the following sudden failure: > > Little-Net-8818:xxx minfrin$ svn update > Updating '.': > svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a reposito

Re: Removing BDB support from 1.15

2025-03-18 Thread Michael Osipov
t; https://lists.apache.org/thread/m4o5l9rntc98y6s8wrhsn329by9bhr19 > [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/99zo1wq003109p06dt1tcxyzd7cyyw32 > > > tis 18 mars 2025 kl. 19:33 skrev Michael Osipov : > > > Folks, > > > > while working on a downstream report of the F

Removing BDB support from 1.15

2025-03-18 Thread Michael Osipov
Folks, while working on a downstream report of the FreeBSD port [1] which affects BDB support I noticed that it was deprecated back in 1.8 (2013). Do you plan to drop it finally after 12 years for the next non-LTS (1.15) version? Michael [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28

Re: "./configure --enable-all-static" does not work reliably

2024-08-15 Thread Michael Osipov
On 2024/08/15 11:14:25 Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > Den tors 15 aug. 2024 kl 13:07 skrev Michael Osipov : > > > Folks, > > > > just wanted to make you aware of this issue on the autoconf setup: > > The following was reported to me: > > https://bugs.freebsd

"./configure --enable-all-static" does not work reliably

2024-08-15 Thread Michael Osipov
Folks, just wanted to make you aware of this issue on the autoconf setup: The following was reported to me: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=279430 It turns out that if '--enable-all-static' is requested '--static' is not passed to pkgconf and library symbols are missing. The

Re: Releasing 1.14.4?

2024-07-05 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2024-07-04 um 20:04 schrieb Nathan Hartman: On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 1:18 PM Michael Osipov wrote: Folks, I happen to be the Subversion port maintainer on FreeBSD and I have been approached by several people that they experience trouble with mailer.py on newer Python versions. I know that

Releasing 1.14.4?

2024-07-04 Thread Michael Osipov
Folks, I happen to be the Subversion port maintainer on FreeBSD and I have been approached by several people that they experience trouble with mailer.py on newer Python versions. I know that there are backport fixes on 1.14.x.. Do you guys see any chance to do a new release before the summer br

Re: Minimum version of JDK for Subversion 1.10 (was Re: JDK 10 removal of javah)

2018-05-20 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2018-05-20 um 16:03 schrieb Stefan Sperling: On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:47:39PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote: On 18.05.2018 14:34, Stefan Sperling wrote: I think you should aim to proceed with your plan as it was. If anyone has strong objections to this, they should be constructive and try

Re: Intentions for 1.11 release timing

2018-05-20 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2018-05-20 um 13:53 schrieb Daniel Shahaf: LTS release: * full backports for at least 2 years, and at least until the next LTS release * security/corruption fixes for at least 4 years, and at least until the next-but-one LTS release Sorry, no. No one can plan with the words "at least

Re: Intentions for 1.11 release timing

2018-05-20 Thread Michael Osipov
Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 02:29:25PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote: > Branch for stabilization 4 months after the last release (which was in 2018-04), so: > > * Branch in 2018-08 > * Aim to release in 2018-10 Wouldn't we also have to adjust our backporting guidelines if we

Re: Minimum version of JDK for Subversion 1.10 (was Re: JDK 10 removal of javah)

2018-05-20 Thread Michael Osipov
On 18.05.2018 14:34, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 08:22:46AM -0400, James McCoy wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 09:46:41AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: Elsewhere in this discussion thread it was suggested to raise the minimum JDK version requirement to Java 1.8. Your statement