Re: svn rm $URI mangles the commit-message-template

2014-07-04 Thread Mark Eichin
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > On 7/3/14 2:16 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > Thanks for your report. > > > > This is definitely not intentional. I can reproduce this on 1.8.x but not > > on trunk. Not sure yet when it was fixed on trunk. > > This was resolved by my commit in r

Re: svn rm $URI mangles the commit-message-template

2014-07-04 Thread Mark Eichin
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Mark Eichin wrote on Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 14:59:30 -0400: > > 1.6 on ubuntu precise gets this right, 1.8 on trusty gets it wrong, the > > following repro script is from trusty: > > > > $ mkdir svnrmbug > > $

svn rm $URI mangles the commit-message-template

2014-07-03 Thread Mark Eichin
1.6 on ubuntu precise gets this right, 1.8 on trusty gets it wrong, the following repro script is from trusty: $ mkdir svnrmbug $ cd svnrmbug /home/eichin/tmp/svnrmbug $ svnadmin create repo $ U=file://$(pwd)/repo $ svn mkdir --parents -m 'base' $U/{trunk,branches,tags,branches/me,tags/me} Commit

Re: svn cross-repo copy loses svn:executable *and* leaves the working dir inconsistent

2011-08-29 Thread Mark Eichin
on, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > That text is from the 1.5 section of the book.  1.5 is over 4 years > old, so current behavior might be different... > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Mark Eichin wrote: >> Huh. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.ref.svn.c

Re: svn cross-repo copy loses svn:executable *and* leaves the working dir inconsistent

2011-08-21 Thread Mark Eichin
Huh. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.ref.svn.c.copy.html actually has a Note: "You can only copy files within a single repository. Subversion does not support cross-repository copying." I guess that means that the bug is that it doesn't check uuids and actually *enforce* this; I'm sure I'm

svn cross-repo copy loses svn:executable *and* leaves the working dir inconsistent

2011-08-16 Thread Mark Eichin
Ran across this while writing a "populate new repo" script, that used svn cp to copy a set of svn-hooks in place (by definition from one repo to another.) What happens is that when a file in the source repo (called "foreign" here) has svn:executable set, the working dir in the destination (called

Re: svnrdump revision inconsistency bugs

2011-05-16 Thread Mark Eichin
oesn't get more attention... though as far as I can tell, it works purely with a combination of the client command line interface and rsync :-) On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:21 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 05/13/2011 05:13 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 05/12/2011 04:26 PM, Mar

Re: svnrdump revision inconsistency bugs

2011-05-13 Thread Mark Eichin
cool, I'll admit I didn't take the time to look at existing test cases to see what style to write them in (partly because I was mostly simplifying the script I was using to perform the original goal); looks like I didn't include trap "rm -rf" 0 lines either (but for debugging the problem one proba

Re: svnrdump revision inconsistency bugs

2011-05-12 Thread Mark Eichin
t; $REPO2_DIR/hooks/pre-revprop-change chmod +x $REPO2_DIR/hooks/pre-revprop-change # 3:HEAD gives, falsely, "svnrdump: E205000: Unsupported revision specifier used; use only integer values or 'HEAD'" echo $REV = 4 $HEAD = 7 svnrdump dump --incremental -r $REV:$HEAD $REPO1 | svnrd

svnrdump revision inconsistency bugs

2011-05-12 Thread Mark Eichin
I'm working on some svn migration-with-history between repos from different companies, git-svn isn't cutting it (close, but it loses properties entirely, and doesn't really give me enough control) so I thought I'd give svnrdump a try, given that it's been recommended for this use a bunch of times..