On 2 Mar 2017, at 6:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Garance A Drosehn wrote on Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 14:48:07 -0500:
I do not see how this extended-sha1 would be easier to
break than the current sha1, because it includes the
current sha1, unchanged.
Regarding "easier to break", you wer
On 1 Mar 2017, at 7:18, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:01:40 +0100:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:17:34PM -0600, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> I really like this idea.
>>>
>>> And we could take a copy of APR's sha1 code, and rejigger
>>> it to perform *both* hashes
On 24 Feb 2017, at 15:46, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> I believe we should prepare a new working format for 1.10.0
> which addresses this problem. I don't see a good way of fixing
> it without a format bump. The bright side of this is that it
> gives us a good reason to get 1.10.0 ready ASAP.
>
> We
On 6 Feb 2017, at 3:58, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 07:21:21PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Stefan Sperling wrote on Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 20:03:36 +0100:
>>> You may have gotten used to a level of activity which was made
>>> possible by several full-time employment positions
4 matches
Mail list logo
