2013.02.12. 14:31, "Philip Martin" ezt írta:
>
> Philip Martin writes:
>
> > Stefan Sperling writes:
> >
> >> OK, I agree that it might not be obvious to someone who doesn't know
> >> how blame actually works internally. It works by incrementally diffing
> >> all revisions that changed the file
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 07:35:07PM +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > > I suppose we should improve Subversion's behaviour here by issuing a
> > > warning if Subversion's own binary-file detection code doe
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 06:36:09PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > The book does indeed not seem to explicitly mention 'svn blame' in this
> > context. I think that should be fixed.
>
> Filed an issue with cmpilato's consent:
> http://co
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 05:51:53PM +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > At any revision, the entire file content could be swapped out and
> binary
> >
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 04:44:39PM +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > I would be ok with shipping it in 1.8, and while I think that the
> suggested
> > wording is better than the current as it suggest a solution, but
> p
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:57:16PM +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to bring up an old issue here:
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2089
> > I've j
Hi,
I would like to bring up an old issue here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2089
I've just bumped into this, and first it was really confusing why would svn
blame work with one xml file, but not with the other, as the
Skipping binary file: 'reference/apc/book.xml'
wasn't re
7 matches
Mail list logo
