On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:27:20 +, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> > and the availablility of anything that can serve git and svn
> > clients will basically make any more svn updates unneeded.
>
> To be frank, tha
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:36:02 +, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
...
>
> I think it's justified paranoia, due to concerns about "how are you
> ever going to keep this reliably in sync with upstream Subversion
> repository features" ?
Like, not at all? (Note: I'm not affiliated with either github
or s
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:13:45 +, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Java has its uses. Replacing a full-blown, fully implemented C++
> codebase where the maintainers, who also set the API's, are all
> working in C++ means entirely different models of file handling,
> memory management, and maintain
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:13:45 +, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
...
> Except, of course when it doesn't. The use of OS specific EOL, which
> git does not support, and subversion keywords like $Id$ and $Author$,
> which git does not support, would seem to me to be an adventure
> begging to happen.
Or
4 matches
Mail list logo
