[PATCH] Re: svnserve via xinetd segfaults

2010-06-21 Thread Alec Kloss
On 2010-04-18 14:42, Aaron Turner wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Kevin Grover wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Aaron Turner wrote: > >> Not sure why, but sometimes svnserve segfaults when it runs via > >> xinetd.  It turns out to be highly repeatable for specific svn > >>

Re: svnserve and sasl cross-realm (was: svnserve and ldap status ?)

2010-05-06 Thread Alec Kloss
On 2010-05-06 11:41, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:38:00AM -0500, Alec Kloss wrote: > > I'm happy to help try to set up a configuration that will demonstrate > > the issue without patching Cyrus SASL. It'll just require a "real" > >

Re: svnserve and sasl cross-realm (was: svnserve and ldap status ?)

2010-05-04 Thread Alec Kloss
On 2010-05-04 16:22, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:16:25PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 03:58:50PM -0500, Alec Kloss wrote: > > > Now please see attached. > > > > Thanks. I'll try to look at this soon. > &

Re: Pushmi support (was Re: Subversion Vision and Roadmap Proposal)

2010-04-09 Thread Alec Kloss
On 2010-04-09 21:54, Tim Starling wrote: [chop] > My problem is that Subversion is so slow, in terms of network > round-trips, that's it's virtually unusable in our application for tasks > like merging and annotating. Chia-liang Kao has done an awesome job of [chop] I assume you're talking about h

Re: svnserve and sasl cross-realm (was: svnserve and ldap status ?)

2010-03-23 Thread Alec Kloss
On 2010-03-23 15:57, Alec Kloss wrote: > On 2010-03-23 11:16, Alec Kloss wrote: > > On 2010-03-23 17:11, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > > Hi Alec, > > > > > > I remember your patch. It looked pretty simple and OK to me, but > > > I didn't

svnserve and sasl cross-realm (was: svnserve and ldap status ?)

2010-03-23 Thread Alec Kloss
On 2010-03-23 11:16, Alec Kloss wrote: > On 2010-03-23 17:11, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > Hi Alec, > > > > I remember your patch. It looked pretty simple and OK to me, but > > I didn't feel confident enough about my own understanding of what > > the