Re: Issue 525 pristines-on-demand: user guide

2022-03-09 Thread Karl Fogel
On 09 Mar 2022, Julian Foad wrote: Daniel Sahlberg wrote: [...] an "iff". I guess this might be the "if and only if" meaning [...] Yes it is. OK, can change. [...] mismatched quotes. Thanks. Both fixed now in my local copy. More substantive reviews are welcome too :-) Might it be better

Re: multi-wc-format review

2022-03-09 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 2:53 PM Julian Foad wrote: > This is why I think we should do at least one of: > > - require the exact first-introduced version (1.8 or 1.15) > - rename the option to use a less ambiguous language, to something like > '--wc-format-version=1.8' (meaning the version in which t

Re: multi-wc-format review

2022-03-09 Thread Julian Foad
On Mar 8 2022, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> By default Subversion will upgrade the working copy to a version >> compatible with Subversion 1.8 and newer. > > Are we assuming that future minor versions (1.16, 1.17, etc.) will all > continue to be able to read/write f31? This seems to be implied by

Re: Issue 525 pristines-on-demand: user guide

2022-03-09 Thread Julian Foad
Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > [...] an "iff". I guess this might be the "if and only if" meaning [...] Yes it is. OK, can change. > [...] mismatched quotes. Thanks. Both fixed now in my local copy. More substantive reviews are welcome too :-) - Julian

Re: Issue 525 pristines-on-demand: user guide

2022-03-09 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den ons 9 mars 2022 15:30Julian Foad skrev: > I have started a detailed user guide for the current design. > > Attached to issue: > Markdown rendered: > > It is initially intended to help ourselves underst

Issue 525 pristines-on-demand: user guide

2022-03-09 Thread Julian Foad
I have started a detailed user guide for the current design. Attached to issue: Markdown rendered: It is initially intended to help ourselves understand exactly what the current design is and does, especia

Re: svn commit: r1898525 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_client.h libsvn_client/upgrade.c libsvn_wc/wc.h svn/help-cmd.c svn/info-cmd.c svn/svn.c

2022-03-09 Thread Julian Foad
> Recommend to remove RESULT_POOL too, since it is unused and the return > type is a pointer-to-const. You're welcome to if you feel stronger than I do but it's off the bottom of my priority list :-) - Julian