Double-checking 'pristines-on-demand-on-mwf' branch doc update.

2022-02-12 Thread Karl Fogel
On 11 Feb 2022, Julian Foad wrote: Re. pristines-on-demand. I have re-based pristines-on-demand on top of multi-wc-format, resulting in a new branch 'pristines-on-demand-on-mwf'. Julian, just FYI I committed r1898020 to update the 'BRANCH-README' file on the new 'pristines-on-demand-on-mwf'

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

2022-02-12 Thread Mark Phippard
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 3:15 PM Karl Fogel wrote: > The name of the "pristines-on-demand" branch implies a certain > behavior -- namely, that pristines can, via some UI, be fetched on > demand :-). But in the MVP we're talking about, pristines in a > given WC are either all present or all absent

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

2022-02-12 Thread Karl Fogel
I wrote: ...does the "pristines-on-demand" branch name still accurately reflect what the state of the onion will be after that branch is merged? Ah, I'll retroactively update my question to now be about the new "pristines-on-demand-on-mwf" branch, of course. Best regards, -Karl

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

2022-02-12 Thread Karl Fogel
On 10 Feb 2022, Julian Foad wrote: My current plan: * multi-wc-format is, I consider, ready for merge to trunk. See thread [1]. -> Please review it. - I can post a diff and a summary log message to help reviewers. * Make pristines-on-demand behaviour conditional on WC format. -

Re: Help with FAIL: wc-queries-test 3: test query expectations

2022-02-12 Thread Julian Foad
Thank you very much, Daniel. Yes, that's spot on. Fixed in r1898002. - Julian