On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:41 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
> Replying to a few different points in this thread.
>
> On Jan 27, Julian Foad wrote:
> > The user can choose one mode, per WC, from a list of options that may
> > include:
> >
> > - off: as in previous versions, no checking, just assume
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> The value "all" [...] is not handled at all by check_pristines_mode().
> [...]
> Or perhaps this patch is at too early a stage for any of this to
> matter :-)
That's right: all those values in the patch are just pencil sketches at
this stage.
The same answer applies to Joha
We need multi-wc-format for issue #525 pristines-on-demand, as discussed
in the long thread "A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects."
It is designed to be a generic framework, not tied to a specific
feature, so while I will do some tests on a local merge of
pristines-on-demand o
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:42 +00:00:
> Furthermore, whenever we have some sort of server-recommended
> configuration, having some syntax to show where the wc differs from the
> recommendation will make sense. For instance, for depth I do
> .
> svn info -R | grep-dctrl -F Depth
Lorenz wrote on Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:07:43 +:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> >Lorenz wrote on Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 07:13:46 +:
> >> Karl Fogel wrote:
> >> >Hi, everyone. I'd like feedback an idea that I've had for some
> >> >years now but never written up before.
> >> >
> >> >Subversion c
5 matches
Mail list logo
