Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

2021-07-31 Thread Karl Fogel
On 31 Jul 2021, C. Michael Pilato wrote: On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 8:16 PM Karl Fogel wrote: The use case I started with is: "Check out a sparse tree, and then check out individual files -- some of them maybe large binary blobs, others maybe smaller -- where you need them. 

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

2021-07-31 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 8:16 PM Karl Fogel wrote: > The use case I started with is: > > "Check out a sparse tree, and then check out individual files -- > some of them maybe large binary blobs, others maybe smaller -- > where you need them. In many cases, one will simply go into a > particular d

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

2021-07-31 Thread Karl Fogel
On 30 Jul 2021, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Ah, I didn't realize that --depth=files would prune directories already checked out. Either we'd have to change that default behavior, or add a new depth type... Or maybe the answer is just that '--depth=directories' automatically makes those directories st

Re: A two-part vision for Subversion and large binary objects.

2021-07-31 Thread Karl Fogel
On 30 Jul 2021, Karl Fogel wrote: On 30 Jul 2021, Daniel Shahaf wrote: What would «svn status» of a modified file without a pristine say? How many network/worktree accesses would it involve? Status would say "modified". The client-side still knows the fingerprint (hash) of the pristine orig

Re: [PATCH] Fix libsvn_ra_serf build with external serf

2021-07-31 Thread Alexandr Miloslavskiy
On 31.07.2021 2:44, Daniel Shahaf wrote: +SVN_SERF_LIBS=["$SVN_SERF_LIBS `$PKG_CONFIG $serf_pc_arg --libs-only-L | $SED -e 's/^-L/-R/g'`"] I'm sceptical about the regex. For all I know, there may be multiple -L options and there may be leading spaces before the first one. More i