Re: svn commit: r1891065 - in /subversion/site/staging-ng: ./ docs/community-guide/ docs/release-notes/ security/

2021-07-09 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den lör 3 juli 2021 kl 00:23 skrev Daniel Sahlberg < daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>: > Den lör 3 juli 2021 kl 00:07 skrev Nathan Hartman < > hartman.nat...@gmail.com>: > >> I lost the part of your reply where you mentioned merging to staging. >> I was hoping to test with a web server and browser, bu

Re: svn commit: r1891237 - in /subversion/site/staging/docs: ./ api/ api/1.13/ api/1.13/search/ api/1.14/ api/1.14/search/ javahl/ javahl/1.13/ javahl/1.13/org/ javahl/1.13/org/apache/ javahl/1.13/org

2021-07-09 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 9:36 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Generating the site API docs from _any_ revision of branches/1.A.x > (whether @HEAD, @${MAGIC_REVISION}, or anything else) would mean > SVN_VER_TAG and SVN_VER_REVISION would have wrong values in the > generated API docs. So, if HACKING says to