Re: "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with TypeError

On 23.04.2020 00:14, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: > Let's take easier one to analyze :) > > On 2020/04/23 6:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:09 PM Daniel Shahaf >> wrote: >> >>> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:16 +00:00: Running "gen-make.py --debug" with Pyt

Re: Problems running testsuite on Windows with Python 3

On 2020/04/23 5:53, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:14 PM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI > wrote: > >> On 2020/04/21 4:03, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI >> >> >> So I wrote a patch for testing (not for commit. it is need to brush up >>

Re: "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with TypeError

Let's take easier one to analyze :) On 2020/04/23 6:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:09 PM Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > >> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:16 +00:00: >>> Running "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with: > Thanks, but now it fails earlier w

Re: Building SVN (dependencies) on Windows

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 9:33 PM Barry Scott wrote: > > I know this pain well. I build svn for macOS and Windows to do the binary > pysvn releases. > > I have the build for the svn client side of things fully automated. > In case this is helpful to you here is what I use. > > The scripts I use are

Re: "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with TypeError

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:09 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:16 +00:00: > > Running "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with: > > > > [[[ > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "gen-make.py", line 326, in > > main(conf, gentype, skip_depen

Re: Problems running testsuite on Windows with Python 3

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 5:14 PM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: > On 2020/04/21 4:03, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 2:16 PM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI > > > > >> So I wrote a patch for testing (not for commit. it is need to brush up > >> even if it can work). > >> > >> At least it should

Re: "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with TypeError

On 2020/04/23 4:16, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Running "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with: > > [[[ > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "gen-make.py", line 326, in > main(conf, gentype, skip_depends=skip, other_options=rest.list) > File "gen-make.py", line 73, in main >

Re: "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with TypeError

Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:16 +00:00: > Running "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with: > > [[[ > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "gen-make.py", line 326, in > main(conf, gentype, skip_depends=skip, other_options=rest.list) > File "gen-make.py", line 73, in

"gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with TypeError

Running "gen-make.py --debug" with Python 3 fails with: [[[ Traceback (most recent call last): File "gen-make.py", line 326, in main(conf, gentype, skip_depends=skip, other_options=rest.list) File "gen-make.py", line 73, in main sorted_targets = list(target_dict.keys()); sorted_target

Re: Problems running testsuite on Windows with Python 3

On 2020/04/22 23:04, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:50 PM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI > wrote: >> ... and what is worse, at least >> >>> FAIL: merge_tests.py 34: conflict markers should match the file's eol style >> >> this one seems to be broken even with Python 2.7, on Windows. >>

Re: Problems running testsuite on Windows with Python 3

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:50 PM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: > > On 2020/04/22 22:18, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > > I'd like to add something along these lines to the Release Notes, > > under "Known Issues in the Release." > > > > Please check for accuracy: > > > > (I haven't tested this myself -- have

Re: Problems running testsuite on Windows with Python 3

On 2020/04/22 22:18, Nathan Hartman wrote: > I'd like to add something along these lines to the Release Notes, > under "Known Issues in the Release." > > Please check for accuracy: > > (I haven't tested this myself -- haven't reached this point yet in my > Windows setup!) > > [[[ > > When usi

Re: Problems running testsuite on Windows with Python 3

Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:18 +00:00: > Please check for accuracy: > > (I haven't tested this myself -- haven't reached this point yet in my > Windows setup!) > I don't have a Windows build either, but a few suggested edits: > [[[ > > When using Python 3.6 or higher on Windows

Re: Problems running testsuite on Windows with Python 3

Earlier, in the thread "schedule for 1.14.0 release"... On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:15 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > In fact, there is very little pressure on getting this in 1.14.0 GA, > because (1) it only affects testsuite-runners on Windows, of which > there are extremely few :-), and (2) the wor

Re: schedule for 1.14.0 release

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 8:15 AM Johan Corveleyn wrote: > In fact, there is very little pressure on getting this in 1.14.0 GA, > because (1) it only affects testsuite-runners on Windows, of which > there are extremely few :-), and (2) the workaround is simple (just > use Py 2.7 for running the tes

Re: schedule for 1.14.0 release

Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:15 +00:00: > In fact, there is very little pressure on getting this in 1.14.0 GA, > because (1) it only affects testsuite-runners on Windows, of which > there are extremely few :-), and (2) the workaround is simple (just > use Py 2.7 for running the test

Re: schedule for 1.14.0 release

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 2:02 PM Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:30 +0200: > > I don't know the exact rules, but does backporting testsuite fixes cause a > > restart of the soak? If we can backport those and include them into the > > final 1.14.0 without restar

Re: schedule for 1.14.0 release

Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:30 +0200: > I don't know the exact rules, but does backporting testsuite fixes cause a > restart of the soak? If we can backport those and include them into the > final 1.14.0 without restarting the soak, that would be ideal. Otherwise ... In general, I

Re: schedule for 1.14.0 release

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 1:11 PM Branko Čibej wrote: > On 22.04.2020 13:06, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:13 AM Stefan Sperling wrote: > >> The current prospected release date for 1.14 is May 6, which is no longer >> viable. The official soak period (which starts today) does

Re: schedule for 1.14.0 release

On 22.04.2020 13:06, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:13 AM Stefan Sperling > wrote: > > The current prospected release date for 1.14 is May 6, which is no > longer > viable. The official soak period (which starts today) does not > allow for >

Re: schedule for 1.14.0 release

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:13 AM Stefan Sperling wrote: > The current prospected release date for 1.14 is May 6, which is no longer > viable. The official soak period (which starts today) does not allow for > a release this soon. We will also need to allocate at least another week > to collect new

schedule for 1.14.0 release

The current prospected release date for 1.14 is May 6, which is no longer viable. The official soak period (which starts today) does not allow for a release this soon. We will also need to allocate at least another week to collect new signatures for the final release artifacts once they have become