Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:41 +0100:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 08:32:38PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > What I'm worried about is that we'll apply the "backwards compatibility
> > until 2.0" promise to something we shouldn't. As I said, issues of
> > this nature can't generally
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:43 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:41:31PM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:21 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:28:26AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> > > > I made the following change and then wa
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 01:41:31PM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:21 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:28:26AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> > > I made the following change and then was able to run the serf x fsfs
> > > test successfully, but I
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 1:21 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:28:26AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> > I made the following change and then was able to run the serf x fsfs
> > test successfully, but I have no idea how/why it worked before (it
> > worked two days ago!) and wh
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:28:26AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> I wanted to run a full build and test all ra and backends overnight
> using my slightly modified variant of tools/dev/unix-build (mostly
> just different/newer versions of dependencies).
>
> It built everything and ran through local
I wanted to run a full build and test all ra and backends overnight
using my slightly modified variant of tools/dev/unix-build (mostly
just different/newer versions of dependencies).
It built everything and ran through local|svn x fsfs|bdb, but when it
prepared to test serf x fsfs, it quit with:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 08:32:38PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> What I'm worried about is that we'll apply the "backwards compatibility
> until 2.0" promise to something we shouldn't. As I said, issues of
> this nature can't generally be found by tests; they can only be found
> by code review.
I
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:55:16AM +0900, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:
> On 2020/03/27 8:55, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Can anyone tell whether we need to pass additional options to
> > swig via SWIG_PY_OPTS at this stage? Do we need -py3 for example?
>
> If we use 3.0.10 <= SWIG < 4.0.0 in release p
8 matches
Mail list logo