Re: Merging branches/swig-py3 to trunk

2019-10-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, 22 Oct 2019 19:39 +00:00: > 1. we release 1.13.0 as planned next week when the soak period ends > (pending any last-minute critical bugs found, of course); Speaking of which, do we have time to get the changes currently in STATUS into .0, or will they need to wait f

Re: 1.13.x and swig-py3

2019-10-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:11:19 -0400: > James McCoy wrote: > > FWIW, since we switched to the new release model, I (in my capacity as > > packager for Debian) basically ignore non-LTS releases. It's easier to > > ignore them, since I know I only want an LTS release in Debian

Re: Issue tracker housecleaning: SVN-1804

2019-10-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:48:28 -0400: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 2:16 AM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI > wrote: > > With this approach, I think the script should exit with code > > other than 0 if an exception raised, to notify error occured to hook > > scripts. Python script exits with

Re: Merging branches/swig-py3 to trunk

2019-10-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Julian Foad wrote on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:23 +00:00: > Branko Čibej wrote: > > $ svn info --show-item=relative-url > > ^/subversion/branches/swig-py3 > > $ svn log --stop-on-copy | egrep '^r\d+ \|' | cut -d '|' -f 2 | sort -u > > cmpilato > > danielsh > > futatuki > > luke1410 > > troycurt

Re: Issue tracker housecleaning: SVN-1804

2019-10-23 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 2:16 AM Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: > On 2019/10/20 13:46, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > From the "Closing Old Issues" department: > > > > SVN-1804: "mailer.py doesn't catch SMTPRecipientsRefused in finish()" > > * Created and last updated in 2004. > > * No comments in more tha