Re: Simplifying our documentation

2019-09-12 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:45 PM Branko Čibej wrote: > On 13.09.2019 04:18, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:12 AM Branko Čibej > > wrote: > > > > On 12.09.2019 05:00, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > > I've been studying the site and there is a site-

Re: Simplifying our documentation

2019-09-12 Thread Branko Čibej
On 13.09.2019 04:18, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:12 AM Branko Čibej > wrote: > > On 12.09.2019 05:00, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > I've been studying the site and there is a site-ng branch created > > 2015. I remember a discussion about it ar

Re: Simplifying our documentation

2019-09-12 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:12 AM Branko Čibej wrote: > On 12.09.2019 05:00, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > I've been studying the site and there is a site-ng branch created > > 2015. I remember a discussion about it around that time but I can't > > find it in the archives now. > > > > Since there are n

Re: Authz perf regression 1.9 -> 1.10

2019-09-12 Thread Sam Toliman
Many thanks for feedback! It was rather a quick example to confirm the possibility to optimize this function in my case.

Re: Authz perf regression 1.9 -> 1.10

2019-09-12 Thread Branko Čibej
On 12.09.2019 13:30, Sam Toliman wrote: > >> (~3500k in my case) > > You have more than 3 million groups? > Misprinted. There are ~3500 groups in my case. > > > The best thing you can do is prepare a patch, with tests, that > > implements your suggestions. Considering of course that correctness is

Re: Authz perf regression 1.9 -> 1.10

2019-09-12 Thread Sam Toliman
>> (~3500k in my case) > You have more than 3 million groups? Misprinted. There are ~3500 groups in my case. > The best thing you can do is prepare a patch, with tests, that > implements your suggestions. Considering of course that correctness is > more important than performance. :) I will try to

Re: Authz perf regression 1.9 -> 1.10

2019-09-12 Thread Branko Čibej
On 12.09.2019 10:44, Sam Toliman wrote: > > How do you propose that the parser should know, in advance, which parts > > of the authz and groups files it can discard unless it parses all of > them? > > By this point >

Re: Authz perf regression 1.9 -> 1.10

2019-09-12 Thread Sam Toliman
> How do you propose that the parser should know, in advance, which parts > of the authz and groups files it can discard unless it parses all of them? By this point b->client_info

Re: Simplifying our documentation

2019-09-12 Thread Branko Čibej
On 12.09.2019 05:00, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:09 AM Julian Foad > wrote: > > Nathan Hartman wrote in thread "Change to Subversion PMC rule for > > approving backports": > > > Julian Foad wrote: > > >> I strongly urge that we simplify any and