On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:47 PM Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:01 PM Branko Čibej wrote:
> >
> > On 04.09.2019 11:44, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:01 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>> Anyway, how about bringing this feature back in some form?
>
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:01 PM Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> On 04.09.2019 11:44, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:01 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
> [...]
> >>> Anyway, how about bringing this feature back in some form?
> >>> - Revert r1724790?
> >> This is clearly the simplest solution, b
On 04.09.2019 11:44, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:01 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
[...]
>>> Anyway, how about bringing this feature back in some form?
>>> - Revert r1724790?
>> This is clearly the simplest solution, but I have no idea what the
>> performance impact would be. From lo
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:01 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> On 02.09.2019 16:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:58 PM Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> On 7 January 2016 at 10:34, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >>> On 6 January 2016 at 08:14, Greg Stein wrote:
> Personally, I'd be more intere
4 matches
Mail list logo