On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 2:27 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Those two operating systems have always been the ones shipping the
> oldest possible SVN release, as far as I can remember. So if they don't
> need Subversion 1.9, I don't see any reason for us to support it beyond
> its 4 years lifetime pro
Subversion 1.9.0 is 4 years old today (release on August 5 2015).
http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning says that
each LTS release is supported for 4 years.
Julian said on IRC that perhaps we decided to support 2 LTS releases
for either 4 years or until another LTS release app
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 08:40:48AM -0400, Doug Robinson wrote:
> Gentle reminder.
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 5:43 PM Doug Robinson
> wrote:
Hi Doug,
The problem should be fixed with this commit: https://svn.apache.org/r1864440
It's a simple matter of creating temporary files in the working cop
Gentle reminder.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 5:43 PM Doug Robinson
wrote:
> Committers, et. al.:
>
> This was just sent to us by a customer. We've verified on at 1.10.4. I
> checked in JIRA and didn't find a matching bug. Should I create a new JIRA?
>
>
> $ svnadmin create test_repo
>
> $ sv
4 matches
Mail list logo
