On 27.11.2017 14:52, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> I know this has been discussed before, but it was never made reality.
> On last week's hackathon we also didn't come to a full consensus on
> various details. But I think we should simply work out those details,
> hopefully come to some compromise, and
At the hackathon last week we (Stefan Hett, Stefan Fuhrmann, Julian,
Bert and I) discussed how we could get releases out faster. We
exchanged ideas of how we could do "time-based releases", i.e. to
agree on a fixed schedule of doing releases, not waiting for
particular features or bugfixes (except
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
@@ -6811,6 +6815,7 @@ svn_client_shelves_list(apr_hash_t **she
*
* @since New in 1.11.
*/
+SVN_EXPERIMENTAL
The doxygen docs should indicate that the function is experimental.
(I only found this reading Bert's patch from today.)
Thanks for finding these issues.
[Changing subject, as apparently the test failures are not connected to
the discussed fix for the rep sharing and issues #4623, #4700]
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> Test expectations may need to be adapted.
> With v7 repos (see r1816402), I get two
> test failures while v4 and v6 pass:
[...]
> FA
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Stefan wrote:
> On 25/11/2017 16:12, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:42:05PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> At the Aachen hackathon I promised to write some code to spit out the sparse
>>> definition of a working copy, or in o
5 matches
Mail list logo