>
> $ svn save --revert -v2 "add hair color to person page"
>>
>> .. does the save and THEN drops the CL and it's changes in working copy -
>> back to no changes but not necessarily up to date.
>>
>
> That sounds like you're proposing an alternative syntax for what the
> 'shelve' command does -- ex
On 10.11.2017 14:20, Julian Foad wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> [...] To achieve such rollbacks, the user would have to first revert,
>> which involves deciding what to revert.
>>
>> And that seems OK to me.
>
> The larger point is that this kind of work flow, and the difficulty of
> working with c
Julian Foad wrote:
[...] To achieve such rollbacks, the user would have to first revert, which
involves deciding what to revert.
And that seems OK to me.
The larger point is that this kind of work flow, and the difficulty of
working with changes in overlapping subtrees, is analogous to some
Paul Hammant wrote:
I'd be happier with save-cl rather than ci-save. Or just 'save', as I'm
not sure what you're saving if not a change list. Incidentally CL looks
pretty close to CI in lower case and that's already used.
Spaces allowed in FOO name?
$ svn save -v2 "add hair color to person
4 matches
Mail list logo
