1. compression-exempt-suffixes = mp3,mp4,jpeg
2. deltification-exempt-suffixes = mp3,mp4,jpeg
Regardless of the setting of 'compression-level', #1 above two mean certain
things can skip the compression attempt. It must give up at a certain
point right?
Same for deltification re #2
I'm assuming
Great insights, Stefan.
So 'cp' with that sync, timed as you outline is averaging 3x slower than
the cp as I had it before.
Thus, that same cp with sync tacked on, is 3x faster that the curl PUT over
HTTP.
That's within the place where any speedup spent on the handoff of between
apache modules w
On 07.07.2017 01:10, Paul Hammant wrote:
With autorevision set to 'on' and curl:
Reverence speed for boot drive to USB3 spinning platter 4TB thing:
paul@paul-HiBox:~$ time cp /home/paul/clientDir/seven
/media/paul/sg4t/sevenb
real0m1.539s
That isn't exactly accurate - you write t
Bert Huijben writes:
> Except for s/ it / is / on this line, +1... Looks very good!
Jacek Materna writes:
> Fair enough!
>
> Rest looks great.
I fixed the typo and committed the patch in https://svn.apache.org/r1801202
Regards,
Evgeny Kotkov
On 06.07.2017 23:11, Philip Martin wrote:
Philip Martin writes:
I've upgraded my JDK and it produced all these warnings.
Excellent to see these warnings being addressed!
There is a second class of warnings of the form:
WARNING: JNI local refs: 57, exceeds capacity: 56
They all seem to
Fair enough!
Rest looks great.
--
Jacek Materna
Assembla
CTO
+1 210 410 7661
+48 578 296 708
Sent from my Mobile Device
> On Jul 7, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
>
> Jacek Materna writes:
>
>> Shouldn't vulnerability / shattered remain a keyword? I believe it was
>> a comment in t
Jacek Materna writes:
> Shouldn't vulnerability / shattered remain a keyword? I believe it was
> a comment in the patch I submitted - just wondering about google-ness
> of it... shattered has a lot of google juice.
I was thinking about turning this FAQ entry into a more or less generic
statement
Shouldn't vulnerability / shattered remain a keyword? I believe it was
a comment in the patch I submitted - just wondering about google-ness
of it... shattered has a lot of google juice.
collision vs. 'shattered / vulnerability'
Otherwise more complete verbiage is always good.
On Fri, Jul 7, 201
> -Original Message-
> From: Evgeny Kotkov [mailto:evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 7 juli 2017 16:46
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: [PATCH] Tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry
>
> Hi all,
>
> I made an attempt to tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry (which is available at
> https://su
Hi all,
I made an attempt to tweak the SHA-1 FAQ entry (which is available at
https://subversion.apache.org/faq#shattered-sha1) to make it a bit more
user-friendly.
Please see the attached patch. What do you think about making a change
like this?
For convenience, here is the final result as pla
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 06.07.2017 23:11, Philip Martin wrote:
>>// Create a local frame for our references
>> - env->PushLocalFrame(LOCAL_FRAME_SIZE);
>> + env->PushLocalFrame(LOCAL_FRAME_SIZE + 100);
>
> Mmph ... it kinda hurts to see how limited the JNI API is in this
> respect. We cou
I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.8.18.
Please choose the mirror closest to you by visiting:
http://subversion.apache.org/download.cgi#supported-releases
This release fixes a bug where a repository would fail to reject two files
having identical SHA-1 checksums [1]. Fu
On 07.07.2017 12:10, Paul Hammant wrote:
> ~/.subversion/servers contains a line that's tunable, right:
>
> # http-compression = no
>
> And per comment, tack on:
>
> --config-option=servers:global:http-compression=no .
>
> I'll report back the results.
>
>
> How is Apache and its modules or
On 06.07.2017 23:11, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> I've upgraded my JDK and it produced all these warnings.
Adding the exception checks is correct. Rewriting everything to use the
jniwrapper abstraction would be even better, but that's a huge-ish heap
of work.
> There is a se
~/.subversion/servers contains a line that's tunable, right:
# http-compression = no
And per comment, tack on:
--config-option=servers:global:http-compression=no .
I'll report back the results.
How is Apache and its modules organized? As separate processes - with
TCP/IP between each?
"Bert Huijben" writes:
> Should we backport these to 1.9.x?
I don't know, possibly. See my other mail to dev for the questions I
have about these checks.
--
Philip
> -Original Message-
> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 6 juli 2017 22:56
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1801108 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native: Array.cpp CreateJ.cpp
> Iterator.cpp OperationConte
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Jacek Materna wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Got back from Ops. We don't have anything "special" setup other than what
> already been mentioned. Overall the defining metrics for commit performance
> are: ssh vs https, rtt on the network path and "randomness" of the blobs
> goin
18 matches
Mail list logo
