Re: ra_svn vwrite_tuple() optional elements robustness

2016-11-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:50:51 +0100: > On 06.11.2016 02:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >During the r1767197 thread, I noticed that vwrite_tuple() doesn't > >enforce its precondition that in the optional part of a tuple, either > >all values are valid or no value is; a call such

Re: ra_svn vwrite_tuple() optional elements robustness

2016-11-14 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 06.11.2016 02:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote: During the r1767197 thread, I noticed that vwrite_tuple() doesn't enforce its precondition that in the optional part of a tuple, either all values are valid or no value is; a call such as vwrite_tuple("(?r?r)", SVN_INVALID_REVNUM, (svn_revnum_t) 42)

RE: svn commit: r1769532 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_log.h libsvn_fs_x/fs.h libsvn_subr/log.c

2016-11-14 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org] > Sent: zondag 13 november 2016 19:20 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1769532 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > include/private/svn_log.h libsvn_fs_x/fs.h libsvn_subr/log.c > > Auth

Re: mod_authz_svn and caching

2016-11-14 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 11.11.2016 01:01, Branko Čibej wrote: On 06.11.2016 13:47, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: On 05.11.2016 17:51, Hans van Kranenburg wrote: I don't see noticable performance issues at all while reparsing the little files every time right now (how big/complex is the average authz file?) I remember gen