Re: [PATCH/RFC] use-sasl=true in --without-sasl builds: make that a fatalerror?

Bert Huijben wrote on Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 09:43:02 +0200: > Isn’t this a documented default value? > > If it is, changing the behavior will likely break many users that don’t use > sasl. The default for use-sasl is 'false', so the only possible breakage is for users who uncommented the "# use-s

Re: svn commit: r1741742 - in /subversion/trunk: contrib/client-side/svn-merge-vendor.py contrib/server-side/fsfsverify.py tools/server-side/svn-backup-dumps.py

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:41:59AM -, stef...@apache.org wrote: > Work towards Python 3 compatibility. Since we already require Python 2.7+, > we can use the new syntax without further limiting our Python 2 support. > > Fix leftovers to complete the replacement of print statements with functi

RE: [PATCH/RFC] use-sasl=true in --without-sasl builds: make that a fatalerror?

Isn’t this a documented default value? If it is, changing the behavior will likely break many users that don’t use sasl. Bert Sent from my Windows 10 phone From: Daniel Shahaf Sent: zaterdag 30 april 2016 02:53 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: [PATCH/RFC] use-sasl=true in --without-sasl