Philip Martin wrote on Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:33:05 +:
> When there are two different signals I don't think there is a 'correct'
> signal with which to exit, all that matters is that we exit with one of
> the signals.
Agreed.
> So how about:
>
> int saved_signum = signum_cancelled;
>
Bert Huijben wrote on Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 13:56:12 +0100:
> Well.. Perhaps ^D works on your platform, but you will need other keys
> on other platforms.
If different platforms use different keys then the message can use
#ifdef to print the right advice. I expected readers to assume that,
at the
Stefan wrote on Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 20:51:08 +0100:
> On 2/7/2016 01:22, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >Stefan wrote on Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 00:34:32 +0100:
> >>+++ fs-loader.c (working copy)
> >>@@ -461,7 +461,8 @@
> >>if (! svn_utf__cstring_is_valid(path))
> >> {
> >>return svn_err
Yves Martin writes:
> I would like to better understand how logical addressing has impact on
> packed shard. My objective is to provide a "unpack" feature with logical
> addressing in my version of "fsfs-reshard.py" script:
> https://github.com/ymartin59/svn-fsfs-reshard
>
> Do you have any hints
Am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2016, 11:48:26 schrieb Andreas Scherer:
> using 'svn patch' directly as a drop-in replacement for [patch]
I found an example where 'svn patch' does _not_ behave as expected and
differently than 'patch' (and other programmes).
When I amend this line
https://github.com/as
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> I think we have two options to fix this: either make signum_cancelled
> a write-once variable (never write to it if it's nonzero), or have the
> handler install SIG_IGN handlers for all signals we catch, not just for
> one of them. Or perhaps both? The former approach se
6 matches
Mail list logo
