Re: Last-Modified HTTP header in GET responses

2016-01-06 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 6 January 2016 at 08:14, Greg Stein wrote: > Personally, I'd be more interested in the effects on the network and its > caching ability. Do we really need to save CPU/IO on the server? Today's > servers seem more than capable, and are there really svn servers out in the > wild getting so crushe

Re: Last-Modified HTTP header in GET responses

2016-01-06 Thread Philip Martin
Ivan Zhakov writes: > On 4 January 2016 at 16:25, Philip Martin wrote: >> >> When I checkout Subversion trunk from my local mirror I cannot measure a >> client gain, but I can measure better server efficiency: >> >> - The CPU used by Apache goes down from 1.2s to 1.1s. >> >> - The number of sy

Re: svn commit: r1723385 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/relocate.c tests/cmdline/relocate_tests.py

2016-01-06 Thread Philip Martin
"Bert Huijben" writes: > I'm wondering, is it safe to do this this way... or should we use the > safer svn_uri_dirname() to split of whole components from a url at a > time. > > Are there cases where this might match half a directory (or host) name? Relocate prefixes do not need to be complete c

RE: svn commit: r1723385 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/relocate.c tests/cmdline/relocate_tests.py

2016-01-06 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org] > Sent: woensdag 6 januari 2016 18:20 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1723385 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > libsvn_client/relocate.c tests/cmdline/relocate_tests.py > > Author: ph

Re: Relocate not working with externals

2016-01-06 Thread Philip Martin
Larry Baird writes: > Julian & Philip, >> >> With 1.8 the relocate does not produce an error but does not relocate >> the external either: > Not relocating the external is a documented subverison issue. > rarely been an issue. The externals in my world are seperate projects that > somebody else

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-06 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 05.01.2016 15:56, Julian Foad wrote: Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on this issue? I guess what you are asking is: Can this tool be used on production data? My answer is: Yes, but it is and will always be an expert tool. The 'analyse' command is perfectl

Re: Relocate not working with externals

2016-01-06 Thread Larry Baird
Julian & Philip, On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:27:27AM +, Philip Martin wrote: > Julian Foad writes: > > > On 16 December 2015, Larry Baird wrote: > >> On FreeBSD 10.2 using subversion 1.9.3 from ports, relocating a working > >> copy > >> with externals does not work. > > > > Hi, Larry. Thanks

Re: Relocate not working with externals

2016-01-06 Thread Philip Martin
Julian Foad writes: > On 16 December 2015, Larry Baird wrote: >> On FreeBSD 10.2 using subversion 1.9.3 from ports, relocating a working copy >> with externals does not work. > > Hi, Larry. Thanks for the problem report. One way you could help push > this issue forward is to code your test case a

Re: Relocate not working with externals

2016-01-06 Thread Julian Foad
On 16 December 2015, Larry Baird wrote: > On FreeBSD 10.2 using subversion 1.9.3 from ports, relocating a working copy > with externals does not work. Hi, Larry. Thanks for the problem report. One way you could help push this issue forward is to code your test case as a Python test in subversion/t

Re: detection of moved branches for svn-normalizer tool

2016-01-06 Thread Julian Foad
Stefan wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: >> Ping!... Stefan H or Stefan F, is there anything further to report on >> this issue? > > I'll have to retest the current trunk against the test case to check out the > current state. Quite busy atm though, so donno if I can squeeze it in this > week. Will do t