RE: Running SVN 1.9.x on ASF servers?

2015-10-09 Thread bert
And since then we lost most custom patches to things like the commit mailer, because policy changed to standardize on using the standard distributions... No more nice summaries of what is merged, but just raw diff output. And still no proper handling of copies, so every pre-copy property is ment

Re: Running SVN 1.9.x on ASF servers?

2015-10-09 Thread Philip Martin
Bert Huijben writes: > I think we have a chicken and egg problem here :( > > The ASF waits until the distributions update... And the distributions > don't update to 1.9 because we apparently don't think it is stable > because we don't update ourselves. When we first discussed the move into the A

RE: Running SVN 1.9.x on ASF servers?

2015-10-09 Thread Bert Huijben
I think we have a chicken and egg problem here :( The ASF waits until the distributions update... And the distributions don't update to 1.9 because we apparently don't think it is stable because we don't update ourselves. On FreeBSD I see zero progress on updating to 1.9, even with 1.9.2. Many

Re: FAQ about using NFS

2015-10-09 Thread Stefan Kueng
On 09.10.2015 18:16, Branko Čibej wrote: On 09.10.2015 17:16, Julian Foad wrote: This FAQ seems rather out of date / lacking in correctness: http://subversion.apache.org/faq#nfs Since 1.7, the SQLite DB in the WC needs 'file locking' to work properly, which (as I understand it) sometime

Running SVN 1.9.x on ASF servers?

2015-10-09 Thread Mark Phippard
Does anyone know if/when it is planned to update the ASF servers to Subversion 1.9? The Apache headers say it is still running 1.8.1. Is that true? Or is it a patched version of 1.8.1 at least? -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/

[PATCH] mod_auth_kerb/mod_auth_ntlm and mod_authz_svn

2015-10-09 Thread Philip Martin
CVE-2015-3185 for httpd and CVE-2015-3184 for Subversion combined to fix a Subversion authz vulnerability. Following the release (httpd 2.4.16 and Subversion 1.8.14) there have been reports of authn failures with mod_auth_kerb and mod_auth_ntlm. These are 3rd party modules maintained outside the

Re: FAQ about using NFS

2015-10-09 Thread Branko Čibej
On 09.10.2015 17:16, Julian Foad wrote: > This FAQ seems rather out of date / lacking in correctness: > > http://subversion.apache.org/faq#nfs > > Since 1.7, the SQLite DB in the WC needs 'file locking' to work > properly, which (as I understand it) sometimes needs to be enabled in > the NFS se

FAQ about using NFS

2015-10-09 Thread Julian Foad
This FAQ seems rather out of date / lacking in correctness: http://subversion.apache.org/faq#nfs Since 1.7, the SQLite DB in the WC needs 'file locking' to work properly, which (as I understand it) sometimes needs to be enabled in the NFS server config, and on some NFS implementations (and ot

RE: svn commit: r1707493 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:libsvn_client/diff.c tests/cmdline/diff_tests.py

2015-10-09 Thread Bert Huijben
Yes. I'm still looking at some code cleanup, but the issue is fixed. Bert -Original Message- From: "Ivan Zhakov" Sent: ‎9-‎10-‎2015 11:08 To: "dev@subversion.apache.org" ; "Bert Huijben" Subject: Re: svn commit: r1707493 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:libsvn_client/diff.c tests/cm

Re: svn commit: r1707493 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/diff.c tests/cmdline/diff_tests.py

2015-10-09 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 8 October 2015 at 14:12, wrote: > > Author: rhuijben > Date: Thu Oct 8 11:12:41 2015 > New Revision: 1707493 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1707493&view=rev > Log: > Resolve issue #4597, and add a regression test for this problem. > Bert, may I resolve issue #4597 as fixed in trunk