svn.apache.org doesn't let me commit this, even though it accepts my
password...
[[[
patch: Make binary patches and git mode changes coexist.
* subversion/libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c
(transitions): Add missing transition.
* subversion/tests/cmdline/patch_tests.py
(patch_binary_file): Tweak the
If you are subscribed to iss...@subversion.tigris.org, you might want to
subscribe to iss...@subversion.apache.org to continue receiving issue
notifications:
issues-subscr...@subversion.apache.org
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 15:06, wrote:
>> I created accounts ‘sussman’ and ‘pburba’ on Jira and e-mailed Ben and Paul
>> about them.
>>
> I've added user mapping for 'sussman' and 'pburba' to migration
> script, even though I'm not sure that
On 28 September 2015 at 13:59, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 28 September 2015 at 13:55, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Luke1410 is offering (on IRC [1]) to add release dates to all the
>> version labels. That would greatly improve the Jira Summary page [2]
>> where one of the first things it attempts to show i
On 28 September 2015 at 13:55, Julian Foad wrote:
> Luke1410 is offering (on IRC [1]) to add release dates to all the
> version labels. That would greatly improve the Jira Summary page [2]
> where one of the first things it attempts to show is a list of
> "Versions: Unreleased" which currently loo
Luke1410 is offering (on IRC [1]) to add release dates to all the
version labels. That would greatly improve the Jira Summary page [2]
where one of the first things it attempts to show is a list of
"Versions: Unreleased" which currently looks very silly.
Bert pointed out that release dates in CHAN
On 28.09.2015 12:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 28 September 2015 at 13:22, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 28.09.2015 12:18, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On 28 September 2015 at 13:02, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 28.09.2015 11:41, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 27 September 2015 at 23:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 28 September 2015 at 13:22, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.09.2015 12:18, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On 28 September 2015 at 13:02, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 28.09.2015 11:41, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 27 September 2015 at 23:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 17:53, Mark Phippard
On 28.09.2015 12:18, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 28 September 2015 at 13:02, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 28.09.2015 11:41, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On 27 September 2015 at 23:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 18 September 2015 at 17:53, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ivan Zhak
On 28 September 2015 at 13:02, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 28.09.2015 11:41, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On 27 September 2015 at 23:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On 18 September 2015 at 17:53, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> I think we should wait for r
On 28.09.2015 11:41, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 27 September 2015 at 23:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On 18 September 2015 at 17:53, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> I think we should wait for responses until the middle of next week.
>
Sounds
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > I'm going to start migration process tomorrow morning. Could you
> > please lock tigris.org project? I think it will ok if our issue
> > tracker will read-only for day or something.
> >
> >
> Issues are finally migrated to ASF JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN
>
On 9/28/2015 11:41 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 27 September 2015 at 23:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
On 18 September 2015 at 17:53, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
I think we should wait for responses until the middle of next week.
Sounds fine for me.
FWI
On 27 September 2015 at 23:24, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 17:53, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> > I think we should wait for responses until the middle of next week.
>>> >
>>> Sounds fine for me.
>>>
>>> FWIW: It's
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Julian Foad
wrote:
> > Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> >> [...] stefan2 told me in person that that part of the
> >> change in r1572363 was unintentional :-). IIUC, he didn't realize that
> >> it would have this effect on the output of dump.
> [...]
> I think the d
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> (New thread, taken from an observation in the "No-op changes no longer
> dumped..." thread. In that thread, I hadn't spotted that it is only
> the props comparison.)
>
> Starting from 1.9.0, the FS API content comparison methods
>
> svn_fs
16 matches
Mail list logo
