On 19 September 2015 at 01:27, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Several issues in the jira conversion:
>
> 1. The 'whiteboard' field isn't converted:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/buglist.cgi?status_whiteboard=.&status_whiteboard_type=regexp
> Bert suggests it doesn't need to be.
> Markus points out
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 7:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 19:33:48 -0400:
>> We probably have all of that somewhere. Our Tigris repository was only
>> created after we moved to Apache because we self hosted our own repos before
>> that. I believe we ju
Mark Phippard wrote on Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 19:33:48 -0400:
> We probably have all of that somewhere. Our Tigris repository was only
> created after we moved to Apache because we self hosted our own repos before
> that. I believe we just loaded the old tars into this repos and the handful
> of h
rhuij...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 22:47:24 -:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Fri Sep 18 22:47:24 2015
> New Revision: 1703925
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1703925&view=rev
> Log:
> Start parsing binary diffs in svn patch. This handles the blocks and
> records the locat
We probably have all of that somewhere. Our Tigris repository was only created
after we moved to Apache because we self hosted our own repos before that. I
believe we just loaded the old tars into this repos and the handful of html
customizations.
We can certainly archive it, but I assume we di
We have a repository on tigris:
http://subversion.tigris.org/source/browse/subversion/
svn checkout http://subversion.tigris.org/svn/subversion/trunk subversion
--username guest --password ''
It's mostly (only?) web pages, but still, it's history. Doing an
svnsync of it takes years, bec
Several issues in the jira conversion:
1. The 'whiteboard' field isn't converted:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/buglist.cgi?status_whiteboard=.&status_whiteboard_type=regexp
Bert suggests it doesn't need to be.
Markus points out we could add it to the "issue description" instead of tossing
The Apache Subversion developers have decided to migrate all tickets
and history from the current issue tracker at Tigris.org[1] to the
Jira instance hosted by the Apache Software Foundation[2].
We feel that an important aspect of the migration is properly
mapping the old accounts of people who've
Hi Bert,
> But given this and our documentation, the only thing about the passed hash
> that we promise are that for each callback type only specific keys are valid
> in the hashtable. All the other values are undefined and it is really upt o
> the api user on how that affects them. In general
The 1.9.2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Please get the tarballs from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on September 30th
so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by September 29th.
Th
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:53:07AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > I have unlocked the tigris project. Someone can ping me when it should
> be
> > locked again.
>
> BTW, every time the project is locked / unlocked I get multiple emails
>
How many final migrations are we going to have until Ivan gives up and we’ll
have to wait another 5 years for somebody to step up and do a migration?
If users have ten comments it’s easier for them to just create an account and
start watching the same issue again, than for us to wait another wee
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:53:07AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I have unlocked the tigris project. Someone can ping me when it should be
> locked again.
BTW, every time the project is locked / unlocked I get multiple emails
from tigris. We should not be doing this very often, I would suggest,
t
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:56:04PM +0200, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> May be we can put issue tracker on tigris read-only: in this case I
> could prepare everything today to avoid potential surprises and the
> time of final migration. Any opinions?
I would prefer we migrate today and don't wait for repli
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 16:53, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I think we should wait for responses until the middle of next week.
> >> >
> >> Sounds fine for me.
> >>
> >>
On 18 September 2015 at 16:53, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I think we should wait for responses until the middle of next week.
>> >
>> Sounds fine for me.
>>
>> FWIW: It's very likely that I will be very busy on next week due my
>> dayj
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > I think we should wait for responses until the middle of next week.
> >
> Sounds fine for me.
>
> FWIW: It's very likely that I will be very busy on next week due my
> dayjob. May be I find some time for final migration or may be not. B
On 18 September 2015 at 16:25, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2015 4:16 pm, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
>>
>> On 18 September 2015 at 16:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:47:06PM +0200, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> >> Attachments was successfully migrated after multiple attempts and
On 18 September 2015 at 15:06, wrote:
> I created accounts ‘sussman’ and ‘pburba’ on Jira and e-mailed Ben and Paul
> about them.
>
I've added user mapping for 'sussman' and 'pburba' to migration
script, even though I'm not sure that it's a good idea to register
account for someone else.
--
Iva
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2015 4:16 pm, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
>>
>> On 18 September 2015 at 16:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:47:06PM +0200, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> >> Attachments was successfully migrated after multiple attempts an
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:25:45PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I've begun sending the mails, from my ASF account. I decided to send
> separate mails to each address, to avoid triggering spam filters as much as
> possible. I'm allowing lots of time between the mails so that I don't get
> accidental
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
I'm ready to perform final migration, but I think we should make issue
> tracker on tigris.org read only. It also would nice finalize tigris ->
> asf user name mappings, at least for most referenced users.
>
Just as a an fyi ..
The way tigris.
On 18 Sep 2015 4:16 pm, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
>
> On 18 September 2015 at 16:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:47:06PM +0200, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> Attachments was successfully migrated after multiple attempts and help
> >> from ASF Infra team. This how Subversion issue t
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:16:22PM +0200, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Currently I'm waiting for tigris -> asf user mapping mails to @tigris
> addresses.
I would say we shouldn't wait for that if it means you can't finish the
migration before you're back home and bound up in $dayjob activities.
On 18 September 2015 at 16:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:47:06PM +0200, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> Attachments was successfully migrated after multiple attempts and help
>> from ASF Infra team. This how Subversion issue tracker will look like:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:47:06PM +0200, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Attachments was successfully migrated after multiple attempts and help
> from ASF Infra team. This how Subversion issue tracker will look like:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN
>
> I'm ready to perform final migration, but I
On 18 September 2015 at 14:37, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 16 September 2015 at 14:44, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On 15 September 2015 at 22:20, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On 15 September 2015 at 20:02, Greg Stein wrote:
You can do it. File an INFRA ticket for porting our issues into JIRA, and
not
The problem here is two folded:
I agree that we *should* properly remove these items from the hash, but we have
had the current behavior since 1.0 even in our previous dav implementation.
But given this and our documentation, the only thing about the passed hash that
we promise are that for each
And if somebody wants to see the whiteboard in digital format there is a PDF at
http://1drv.ms/1Mvg4nX
Bert
From: Julian Foad
Sent: vrijdag 18 september 2015 14:28
To: dev
Subject: Whiteboard -- topics list on the white board
It's the last day of the hackathon. The following ideas are writte
I created accounts ‘sussman’ and ‘pburba’ on Jira and e-mailed Ben and Paul
about them.
Bert
From: Ivan Zhakov
Sent: vrijdag 18 september 2015 14:38
To: Greg Stein
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Migrating Subversion issues to ...
On 16 September 2015 at 14:44, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> O
We have found a bug in the ssl_server_cert() function in lib_ra_serf. This bug
is present in 1.8.14 but we believe it has been present for some time.
The bug is as follows:
If Serf determines that a server certificate is invalid it calls into
lib_ra_serf, which then requests two types of creden
On 16 September 2015 at 14:44, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 15 September 2015 at 22:20, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On 15 September 2015 at 20:02, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> You can do it. File an INFRA ticket for porting our issues into JIRA, and
>>> note that you have some content for a test load. They do tes
It's the last day of the hackathon. The following ideas are written on
the white board (so far).
This is just a scratch pad where we noted some ideas, some
individually and some collectively. Not everything we discussed is
listed; and we didn't discuss all of these. These brief notes are not
meant
On 18 September 2015 at 01:50, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 17 September 2015 at 21:53, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>> > Ivan Zhakov writes:
>> >
[...]
>> > Detect the error from a broken RA
>> > session and create another? Track the time
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:41:41PM +0200, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> That branch is complete and ready for merging, but I'm still not sure
> whether we should merge it or not.
I think we should merge it to trunk now.
I don't think this branch can improve much further unless we start
exercising the code
Hi,
Von: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com]
> On 17 September 2015 at 21:53, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > Ivan Zhakov writes:
> >
> >> I think now is good moment to discuss whether we should merge
> >> ra-reuse-session [1] branch to trunk or not: it's better to merge
> >> such branch in the b
36 matches
Mail list logo
