Julian Foad writes:
> Also for:
>svnrdump load
>svnmucc put -
>
> ? (These just came to mind when I thought about it.)
I think, yes. Thank you for pointing this out, Julian.
Regards,
Evgeny Kotkov
Andrea Pescetti wrote on Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 08:19:05 +0200:
> Hi, the attached patch fixes a trivial typo in the Italian
> translation when using "svn propedit".
+1 to commit, thanks!
Is the following patch correct?
Index: subversion/libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c
===
--- subversion/libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c (revision 1702341)
+++ subversion/libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c (working copy)
@@ -1438,7 +1438,9 @@ svn_diff_parse_next
Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> - Enable buffering in three subcommands: svnadmin load, svnadmin load-revprops
> and in svnfsfs load-index.
Also for:
svnrdump load
svnmucc put -
? (These just came to mind when I thought about it.)
- Julian
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> So, you are absolutely right about APR buffering being enough for our
> non-interactive "read stdin as a single large file" usage in load & friends.
>
> My last concern is as follows. We need an alternative implementation
> for svn_stream_for_stdin. I see 3 options:
>
>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann <
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 10.09.2015 23:50, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
>> > Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>> >
>> > + * Special files like STDIN will have no flags set at all. In
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.09.2015 23:50, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> > Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> >
> > + * Special files like STDIN will have no flags set at all. In that
> case,
> > + * we can't filter and must allow any operation - which may then fail
> at
>
On 10.09.2015 23:50, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> + * Special files like STDIN will have no flags set at all. In that case,
> + * we can't filter and must allow any operation - which may then fail at
> + * the APR level further down the stack.
> + */
> + apr_uint32_t
8 matches
Mail list logo