danie...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 21:48:18 -:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Thu Jul 23 21:48:18 2015
> New Revision: 1692450
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1692450
> Log:
> * STATUS: Nominate r1692448.
...
> + * r1692448
> + Require Python 2.7 for Subversion 1.9, part 1: docume
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:16 PM Grierson, David
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> > Sent: 23 July 2015 07:59
> > To: us...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
> >
> > On 22.07.2015 15:51
On 23.07.2015 17:01, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I like this proposal... but I'm wondering in what case Linux build
> environments need python. Those very old enterprise versions are
> unlikely to have python 2.7 or newer.
When building from a tarball, you only need Python to run the test suite.
There
I like this proposal... but I'm wondering in what case Linux build environments
need python. Those very old enterprise versions are unlikely to have python 2.7
or newer.
Bert
-Original Message-
From: "Branko Čibej"
Sent: 23-7-2015 11:02
To: "dev@subversion.apache.org"
Subject: Re:
Hi,
as suggested by danielsh and with the input from Bert on IRC following
is a suggested patch to correct/update the stated Perl-requirements for
building on Windows in the install-documentation.
The update applies in principle to 1.7, 1.8, 1.9 and trunk.
The old phrasing incorrectly suggest
On 23.07.2015 11:15, Grierson, David wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: 23 July 2015 07:59
>> To: us...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
>>
>> On 22.07.2015 15:51, Bert Huijben wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: 23 July 2015 07:59
> To: us...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature request: Save the old file when svn revert
>
> On 22.07.2015 15:51, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Da
On 23.07.2015 10:30, Stefan Hett wrote:
> Hi,
>
- For 1.9, it's a little late to make any changes, but I would
consider
dropping py2.5 support (and converting to the 'except' 'as'
syntax),
since for 1.9 py3 support is more important than py2.5 support.
Thoug
Hi,
- For 1.9, it's a little late to make any changes, but I would consider
dropping py2.5 support (and converting to the 'except' 'as' syntax),
since for 1.9 py3 support is more important than py2.5 support.
Thoughts?
I'd rather not mess with the 1.9 branch at this point ... we're so cl
9 matches
Mail list logo
