Re: Getting ready for RC2 (was: Apache Subversion 1.9.0-rc1 released)

2015-05-20 Thread Branko Čibej
On 21.05.2015 06:41, Ben Reser wrote: > On 5/20/15 10:47 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> I think we can roll; I'll get started on the RM tasks tomorrow, if >> on-one else wants to do this (I know Ben was going to do the 1.9 bits, >> but it looks like he's out of time for that). >> >> In the meantime, th

Re: Getting ready for RC2 (was: Apache Subversion 1.9.0-rc1 released)

2015-05-20 Thread Ben Reser
On 5/20/15 10:47 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > I think we can roll; I'll get started on the RM tasks tomorrow, if > on-one else wants to do this (I know Ben was going to do the 1.9 bits, > but it looks like he's out of time for that). > > In the meantime, the 1.9 release notes need a lot of work; I th

Re: SVN write through proxy out off sync

2015-05-20 Thread Mustafa Karci
Well, the problem seems to be the logg. In de svn i had enabled logg. So the /var/log/http was around 7gb. This is makes no sence because we still had more than 20gb of free disk space. So disabled log and removing all files in the http, this seems to do the job. And the question do we monitoring

Re: Getting ready for RC2 (was: Apache Subversion 1.9.0-rc1 released)

2015-05-20 Thread Branko Čibej
On 20.05.2015 19:31, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] >> Sent: maandag 11 mei 2015 12:31 >> To: Subversion Development >> Subject: Getting ready for RC2 (was: Apache Subversion 1.9.0-rc1 released) >> >> Now that this is out of the

RE: Getting ready for RC2 (was: Apache Subversion 1.9.0-rc1 released)

2015-05-20 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] > Sent: maandag 11 mei 2015 12:31 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: Getting ready for RC2 (was: Apache Subversion 1.9.0-rc1 released) > > Now that this is out of the way, I propose we start rolling > RC2 immediat

RE: svn commit: r1680528 - /subversion/branches/fsx-1.10/subversion/libsvn_fs_x/transaction.c

2015-05-20 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org] > Sent: woensdag 20 mei 2015 13:33 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1680528 - /subversion/branches/fsx- > 1.10/subversion/libsvn_fs_x/transaction.c > > Author: stefan2 > Date: Wed May 2

Re: JavaHL: ClientNotifyCallback reports unexpected kind "file" for symlinks

2015-05-20 Thread Branko Čibej
On 20.05.2015 08:54, Marc Strapetz wrote: > On 19.05.2015 16:40, Bert Huijben wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com] >>> Sent: dinsdag 19 mei 2015 15:59 >>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >>> Subject: JavaHL: ClientNotifyCallback report

Re: Segfault in Perl bindings when commit touches a large number of files

2015-05-20 Thread Roderich Schupp
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 6:19 AM, James McCoy wrote: > I'm still experiencing the crash in 1.9.0-rc1 unless I apply the > original change I suggested to the generated > subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/svn_delta.c. I'm not sure how that > specific part of the file is generated, so I'll just a

Re: [PATCH] fsfs7 index offset validation

2015-05-20 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Stefan, > > How about the following patch to sanity check the rev file footer? > Committed as r1680460 with a minor modification. > > Index: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/low_level.c >

Re: [PATCH] fsfs7 index offset validation

2015-05-20 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 18 May 2015 at 02:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Stefan, > > > > How about the following patch to sanity check the rev file footer? > > > [...] > > > > > The error looks like this: > > > > subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/rev_file.c:263, > >

Re: reversible fingerprint comment in membuffer code

2015-05-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:36:23AM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Philip Martin > wrote: > > I talked to Stefan and I believe I can explain. > Yes. > Exactly. Is it worth extending the comment in the code with information from this thread?

Re: JavaHL: ClientNotifyCallback reports unexpected kind "file" for symlinks

2015-05-20 Thread Marc Strapetz
On 19.05.2015 16:40, Bert Huijben wrote: -Original Message- From: Marc Strapetz [mailto:marc.strap...@syntevo.com] Sent: dinsdag 19 mei 2015 15:59 To: dev@subversion.apache.org Subject: JavaHL: ClientNotifyCallback reports unexpected kind "file" for symlinks When recursively adding a