On 16.02.2015 03:29, Branko Čibej wrote:
> * 4556 Replace 'svn youngest' with another UI
> Not much discussion here. I propose we do either option 2 ('svnmucc
> youngest'), or rip out the subcommand entirely since there are lots
> of ways to the info.
I'm going to have a go at an alt
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 14:34:55 +0100:
> On 13.02.2015 11:25, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > +++ build/generator/gen_base.py (working copy)
> > @@ -248,12 +248,12 @@
> > try:
> > - old_contents = open(fname, 'rb').read()
> > + old_contents = open(fname, 'r').read()
> > except IOEr
On 12.02.2015 11:12, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 16.01.2015 11:06, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> A couple months down the line, and I'd like to make another call for
>> creating the 1.9 release branch. AFAICS the x509 branch still needs
>> merging if we want it in 1.9 (which I think we do, since IIUC trunk
>
On 15.02.2015 14:24, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 15.02.2015 01:03, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
>>> Sent: donderdag 12 februari 2015 11:13
>>> To: Subversion Development
>>> Subject: Re: Time to branch 1.9
>>>
>>> On 16.01.2015 1
On 15.02.2015 01:03, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 12 februari 2015 11:13
>> To: Subversion Development
>> Subject: Re: Time to branch 1.9
>>
>> On 16.01.2015 11:06, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> A couple months do
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: donderdag 12 februari 2015 11:13
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Time to branch 1.9
>
> On 16.01.2015 11:06, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > A couple months down the line, and I'd like to make another call
6 matches
Mail list logo