[l10n] Translation status report for trunk r1651276

2015-01-12 Thread Subversion Translation Status
Translation status report for trunk@r1651276 lang trans untrans fuzzy obs -- de2874 3 9 490 +~o es2265 612 830 528 ++U~~~ fr2569 308

Re: [serf-dev] Re: [PATCH] Serf crash on spurious data between responses

2015-01-12 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > $ valgrind -q test/test_all > ==11901== Invalid read of size 8 > ==11901==at 0x403E7CF: serf_config_get_object (config_store.c:278) > ==11901==by 0x403F88A: serf__log (logging.c:146) > ==11901==by 0x4048E79: serf_log_wrapped_readline > (log_wrapper_buckets.c:5

Re: [serf-dev] Re: [PATCH] Serf crash on spurious data between responses

2015-01-12 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > Lieven Govaerts writes: > >> Is there a reason you specifically mention pipelined here? The first >> response has been handled so it's just synchronous communication. > > The point is that the client reads data from the server before sending > the second response. If the

Re: [serf-dev] Re: [PATCH] Serf crash on spurious data between responses

2015-01-12 Thread Philip Martin
Lieven Govaerts writes: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Philip Martin >> >> I'm not familiar with serf's testsuite. The scenario: >> >> - client sends first request >> - server sends response >> - server sends extra data, say '\n' >> - client handles first request >> - client creat

Re: svn commit: r1649029 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_x: ./ dag.c tree.c

2015-01-12 Thread Branko Čibej
On 12.01.2015 16:54, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 12 January 2015 at 18:39, Julian Foad wrote: >> Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649029 >> Log: >> Sync FSX with FSFS: Merge DAG-related sub-pool introduction >> patches r1647905, r1648243, r1648253 and r1648272 from FS

Re: svn commit: r1649029 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_x: ./ dag.c tree.c

2015-01-12 Thread Julian Foad
Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 12 January 2015 at 18:39, Julian Foad wrote: >> Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649029 >> Log: >> Sync FSX with FSFS: Merge DAG-related sub-pool introduction >> patches r1647905, r1648243, r1648253 and r1648272 from FSFS >> and resolve

Re: svn commit: r1649029 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_x: ./ dag.c tree.c

2015-01-12 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:54:22PM +0300, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > Subversion community guide is very specific about proper log messages > and I don't understand why this commit (and other previous FSX "merge" > commits") does not follow it. > > Quoting Subversion community guide [1] again: > [[[ > Th

Re: svn commit: r1649029 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_x: ./ dag.c tree.c

2015-01-12 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 12 January 2015 at 18:39, Julian Foad wrote: > Ivan Zhakov wrote: > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649029 > Log: > Sync FSX with FSFS: Merge DAG-related sub-pool introduction > patches r1647905, r1648243, r1648253 and r1648272 from FSFS > and resolve the usual text conflicts d

Re: svn commit: r1649029 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_x: ./ dag.c tree.c

2015-01-12 Thread Julian Foad
Ivan Zhakov wrote: URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649029 Log: Sync FSX with FSFS: Merge DAG-related sub-pool introduction patches r1647905, r1648243, r1648253 and r1648272 from FSFS and resolve the usual text conflicts due to naming differences. Block revisions r1648230,

Re: svn commit: r1649029 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_x: ./ dag.c tree.c

2015-01-12 Thread Ivan Zhakov
5 January 2015 at 15:49, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> On 2 January 2015 at 16:46, wrote: >> > Author: stefan2 >> > Date: Fri Jan 2 13:46:57 2015 >> > New Revision: 1649029 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649029 >> > Log: >> > Sync FSX w

Re: Testing equality between svnrdump and svnadmin dump

2015-01-12 Thread Julian Foad
Branko Čibej wrote: > On 12.01.2015 13:54, Julian Foad wrote: >> svnmucc_tests.py 2 'basic svnmucc tests' generates a no-op modification >> to an empty file, in revision 16. 'svnadmin dump' outputs this: >>  [[[ >>  I: Node-path: boozle/buz/svnmucc-test.py >>  I: Node-kind: file >>  I: Node-action:

Re: Testing equality between svnrdump and svnadmin dump

2015-01-12 Thread Branko Čibej
On 12.01.2015 13:54, Julian Foad wrote: > I (Julian Foad) wrote: >> The few differences I have found seem to be already known (but not >> necessarily >> adequately addressed). These include: svnrdump always sets 'Prop-delta: >> true' even when unnecessary; svnrdump doesn't output some of the >>

Re: svn commit: r1649012 [1/3] - in /subversion/trunk: ./ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/

2015-01-12 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On 5 January 2015 at 15:43, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> >> On 2 January 2015 at 15:43, wrote: >> > Author: stefan2 >> > Date: Fri Jan 2 12:43:42 2015 >> > New Revision: 1649012 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649012 >> > Log: >> > Merge

Re: [serf-dev] Re: [PATCH] Serf crash on spurious data between responses

2015-01-12 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Lieven Govaerts writes: > >> You're trying to capture the situation where serf has: >> - finished writing a request ( req_bkt == NULL && writing_started ) >> - has no more requests in the pending queue >> - and receives actual bytes of data

Re: Testing equality between svnrdump and svnadmin dump

2015-01-12 Thread Julian Foad
I (Julian Foad) wrote: > The few differences I have found seem to be already known (but not > necessarily > adequately addressed). These include: svnrdump always sets 'Prop-delta: > true' even when unnecessary; svnrdump doesn't output some of the > checksum headers that svnadmin does; they put

Re: [serf-dev] Re: [PATCH] Serf crash on spurious data between responses

2015-01-12 Thread Philip Martin
Lieven Govaerts writes: > You're trying to capture the situation where serf has: > - finished writing a request ( req_bkt == NULL && writing_started ) > - has no more requests in the pending queue > - and receives actual bytes of data. > Right? > > Looks like your patch is a correct way to fix th

Re: [serf-dev] Re: [PATCH] Serf crash on spurious data between responses

2015-01-12 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi, On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Philip Martin writes: > >> Philip Martin writes: >> >>> While debugging a problem reported on users I accidentally sent an extra >>> byte to the client: I sent Content-Length of N and then sent N+1 bytes. >>> The first N bytes made a