Re: 1.8.11 up for testing/signing

2014-12-09 Thread Philip Martin
Summary: +1 to release Platform: Linux (Debian/wheezy) 64-bit Tested: (local, svn, svn/sasl, serf, serf/v1) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb) swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb, ctypes-python javahl x (fsfs, bdb) Results: All tests successful apart from known failures for log_tests.py 37 a

Re: 1.8.11 up for testing/signing

2014-12-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 01:30:39AM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: > The 1.8.11 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. > Please get the tarballs from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion > and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on December 15th so > ple

Re: On pool / memory usage debugging

2014-12-09 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Sperling writes: > Should we raise an issue with mod_dav developers? (gstein?) I suspect any mod_dav fixes are probably going to be written by us. I think the fix might be to have dav_validate_request() identify the conditions that mean dav_validate_walker() will always return NULL, i.e.

RE: 1.8.11 up for testing/signing

2014-12-09 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org] > Sent: dinsdag 9 december 2014 10:31 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: 1.8.11 up for testing/signing > > The 1.8.11 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. > Please get the tarballs from > https://di

Re: On pool / memory usage debugging

2014-12-09 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:30:31PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann > > > > Finally, to minimize cache usage, make sure to disable fulltext > > > > caching as well (enabled by default in 1.9) and set the cache > > > > size to *1*, not 0. The latter w

Re: On pool / memory usage debugging

2014-12-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:23:10PM +, Philip Martin wrote: > Philip Martin writes: > > > I think this extra walk is pointless most of the time and is just making > > our nominally O(1) copy operation slower. Locks on the copy source do > > not prevent a copy. > > Oops! I meant to write "Loc

Re: svn commit: r1643189 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./ subversion/ subversion/include/svn_repos.h subversion/libsvn_repos/load-fs-vtable.c subversion/tests/libsvn_repos/repos-test.c subversion/t

2014-12-09 Thread Julian Foad
Ben Reser wrote: > With careful effort of stefan2 and myself we've reverted this.  It was > mistakenly merged onto the 1.7.x branch not the 1.7.x-r1643074 branch. Ouch. Thank you very much for unpicking my mistake. This is at least the third backport-related thing I've got wrong recently :-( > N

1.8.11 up for testing/signing

2014-12-09 Thread Ben Reser
The 1.8.11 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on December 15th so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by December 13th. Thi

1.7.19 up for testing/signing

2014-12-09 Thread Ben Reser
The 1.7.19 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on December 15th so please try and get your votes/signatures in place by December 13th. Thi