Re: Regression in bindings? 1.7/1.8 vs 1.6

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > > > The solution seems to be to simply destroy the txn_dir_cache > > instance at the begin of the commit. That comes at some extra > > cost but that is still proportional to the size of the commit. > > There would

Re: Performance Results on Windows

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann < > stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote: > > It seems that CollabNET and other hosting providers possibly have one >> >>> of the worst configuration for log-adressing feature. Multiple users

Re: Performance Results on Windows

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann < stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote: It seems that CollabNET and other hosting providers possibly have one > >> of the worst configuration for log-adressing feature. Multiple users >> access over HTTP to a number of gigabyte-sized repositories (so

Re: Performance Results on Windows

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:21 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 23 July 2014 17:19, Stefan Fuhrmann > wrote: > > Updated and final results: > > > > * svnadmin dump results now included, f6 / f7 is +/-20% > > > > * fixed anomaly with ra_serf, results consistent with previous findings > > 'null-export'

Re: Performance Results on Windows

On 23 July 2014 17:19, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Updated and final results: > > * svnadmin dump results now included, f6 / f7 is +/-20% > > * fixed anomaly with ra_serf, results consistent with previous findings > 'null-export' tests have been rerun and old results been replaced > > * added a pag

Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing

On 13.08.2014 13:38, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 13 August 2014 14:16, Bert Huijben wrote: >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] >>> Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2014 13:06 >>> To: Bert Huijben >>> Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development >>> Subject: Re: 1.7.18

Re: svn commit: r1617108 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

On 13.08.2014 10:52, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Branko Čibej > wrote: > > On 11.08.2014 18:37, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Branko Čibej > > wrote: >> >> On 10.0

Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing

On 13 August 2014 14:16, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] >> Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2014 13:06 >> To: Bert Huijben >> Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development >> Subject: Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing >> >> On 11 August 2014

Re: svn commit: r1617148 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

On 13 Aug 2014 10:10, "Stefan Fuhrmann" wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >> On 10.08.2014 21:17, stef...@apache.org wrote: >>> >>> Author: stefan2 >>> Date: Sun Aug 10 19:17:53 2014 >>> New Revision: 1617148 >> >> [...] >>> >>> @@ -973,7 +869,11 @@ add_complex_ma

Re: [PATCH] allow conflict descriptions with NULL repos_relpaths

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 08:04:37PM +, Bert Huijben wrote: > I don't see a problem with not allowing a repository location, but it doesn't > make sense to me to have a revision in that case. You either have both, or > have none. > > If you want to tell that the node didn't exist in a revision

Re: Regression in bindings? 1.7/1.8 vs 1.6

Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > The solution seems to be to simply destroy the txn_dir_cache > instance at the begin of the commit. That comes at some extra > cost but that is still proportional to the size of the commit. There would be no cost to mod_dav_svn since the txn_dir_cache is already NULL wh

RE: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing

> -Original Message- > From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com] > Sent: maandag 11 augustus 2014 13:06 > To: Bert Huijben > Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development > Subject: Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing > > On 11 August 2014 14:54, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -Original Message

Re: svn commit: r1617148 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.08.2014 21:17, stef...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sun Aug 10 19:17:53 2014 > New Revision: 1617148 > > [...] > > @@ -973,7 +869,11 @@ add_complex_matches(lookup_state_t *stat >for (i = 0; i < patterns->nelts; ++

Re: svn commit: r1617108 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 11.08.2014 18:37, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > >> On 10.08.2014 18:57, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >> >>> FWIW, you should even have the get_memberships function any more. >>> >>> >>> To

Re: svn commit: r1616338 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs.c

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:35:09PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > @@ -245,6 +245,16 @@ initialize_fs_struct(svn_fs_t *fs) > > > >return SVN_NO_ERROR; > > > > } > > >