Re: [PATCH] add support for svnrdump to svn-backup-dumps.py

I updated for head revision. [[[ add support for svnrdump to svn-backup-dumps.py * tools/server-side/svn-backup-dumps.py () : fix comment () : update to ver 0.7 () : import urlparse (SvnBackup.__init__) : fix message in SvnBackupException constructor. (SvnBackup.__init__) : check wheth

[l10n] Translation status report for trunk r1617405

Translation status report for trunk@r1617405 lang trans untrans fuzzy obs -- de2725 63 230 471 +++~~~ es2232 556 793 528 ++U~~~ fr2536 252

Re: [PATCH] add support for svnrdump to svn-backup-dumps.py

Hello Could you review my patch? 2013-09-08 23:25 GMT+09:00 Masaru Tsuchiyama : > Ben Reser wrote: > > On 8/18/13 5:34 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> Haven't looked at the rest of the patch, perhaps Ben will as he reviewed > >> an earlier iteration. (but I know he is a bit busy this week, incl

Re: Regression in bindings? 1.7/1.8 vs 1.6

Wow. Thanks for the very detailed and on the spot explanation. On Monday, August 11, 2014 01:50:48 PM Philip Martin wrote: > Ben Reser writes: > > I haven't dug in to the specifics of how we broke this particular use > > case. > > But I suspect you'll find that if you create a transaction, call >

Re: Regression in bindings? 1.7/1.8 vs 1.6

Philip Martin writes: > svn_fs_txn_root() calls svn_fs_fs__initialize_txn_caches() and if that > detects concurrent transactions it sets ffd->txn_dir_cache to NULL so > the out-of-date cache doesn't get used and the property change on disk > makes it into the revision. The txn_dir_cache gets cle

Re: svn commit: r1617108 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

On 11.08.2014 18:37, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Branko Čibej > wrote: > > On 10.08.2014 18:57, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 10.08.2014 16:00, stef...@apache.org >> wrote: >>> Author: stefan2 >>>

Re: [VOTE] Merge svn-auth-x509 branch to trunk?

On 8/11/14 1:59 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > My primary concerns was that with svn_checksum_to_cstring_display2() > we have to care at every place to use proper flags to get some > canonical representation for protocol/storage. How about svn_checksum_to_cstring_canonical() which is just this macro: #d

Re: svn commit: r1616338 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs.c

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 06:35:09PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > @@ -245,6 +245,16 @@ initialize_fs_struct(svn_fs_t *fs) > > >return SVN_NO_ERROR; > > > } > > > > > > +/* Reset vtable and fsap_data fields in FS such that the FS i

Re: svn commit: r1617108 - /subversion/branches/authzperf/subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c

On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.08.2014 18:57, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 10.08.2014 16:00, stef...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sun Aug 10 14:00:08 2014 > New Revision: 1617108 > > [...] > > (has_matching_rule): Update to new data model - just it

Re: svn commit: r1616338 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs.c

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 08:15:44PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: stefan2 > > Date: Wed Aug 6 20:15:43 2014 > > New Revision: 1616338 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1616338 > > Log: > > Beautify bits of the hotcopying c

Re: svn commit: r1615349 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_error_codes.h libsvn_subr/mutex.c

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 4 August 2014 17:48, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 04.08.2014 15:22, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > > > On 2 August 2014 23:13, wrote: > > > > @@ -195,7 +206,9 @@ svn_mutex__unlock(svn_mutex__t *mutex, > > #else > >/* Update lock counter. *

Re: svn commit: r1614703 - in /subversion/branches/authzperf: BRANCH-README subversion/include/svn_string.h subversion/libsvn_repos/authz.c subversion/libsvn_subr/string.c

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 30 July 2014 20:27, wrote: > > Author: stefan2 > > Date: Wed Jul 30 16:27:44 2014 > > New Revision: 1614703 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1614703 > > Log: > > On the authzperf branch: Implement support for generic / complex > > wild

Re: svn commit: r1604421 - in /subversion/trunk: subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/tests/cmdline/ subversion/tests/libsvn_fs_fs/ tools/server-side/svnfsfs/

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 30 June 2014 14:19, Stefan Fuhrmann > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Ivan Zhakov > wrote: > >> > >> On 26 June 2014 19:08, Stefan Fuhrmann > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi Ivan, > >> > > >> > I see three alternative ways to

Apache Subversion 1.7.18 released

I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.18. This release addresses two security issues: CVE-2014-3522: ra_serf improper validation of wildcards in SSL certs. CVE-2014-3528: credentials cached with svn may be sent to wrong server. Please choose the mirror closest to you

Apache Subversion 1.8.10 released

I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.8.10. This release addresses two security issues: CVE-2014-3522: ra_serf improper validation of wildcards in SSL certs. CVE-2014-3528: credentials cached with svn may be sent to wrong server. Please choose the mirror closest to you

Re: Regression in bindings? 1.7/1.8 vs 1.6

Ben Reser writes: > I haven't dug in to the specifics of how we broke this particular use case. > But I suspect you'll find that if you create a transaction, call > svn_fs_change_node_prop() and commit the transaction that this call works just > fine. So I'd bet that the problem only happens whe

Re: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing

On 11 August 2014 14:54, Bert Huijben wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] >> Sent: zondag 10 augustus 2014 17:40 >> To: 'Ben Reser'; 'Subversion Development' >> Subject: RE: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing >> >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > F

RE: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing

> -Original Message- > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > Sent: zondag 10 augustus 2014 17:40 > To: 'Ben Reser'; 'Subversion Development' > Subject: RE: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] > > Sent: d

Re: svn commit: r1617088 - in /subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509: subversion/include/ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb/ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/ subvers

On 11.08.2014 11:56, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > Anyway, I got your point that it's bad to change branch when it's in > review/vote stage. So I've reverted all my branch changes in r1617225. > I'll wait until Ben resolve my concerns about branch raised on [VOTE] > thread. Thanks! This is all so much eas

Re: svn commit: r1617088 - in /subversion/branches/svn-auth-x509: subversion/include/ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/ subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb/ subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/ subversion/libsvn_fs_x/ subvers

On 11 August 2014 03:54, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.08.2014 22:26, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > > On 10 August 2014 20:47, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 10.08.2014 13:00, i...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: ivan > Date: Sun Aug 10 11:00:39 2014 > New Revision: 1617088 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617088

Re: [VOTE] Merge svn-auth-x509 branch to trunk?

On 10 August 2014 18:35, Ben Reser wrote: > On 8/10/14 5:03 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >> I agree svn_checksum_to_cstring_display() is wrong name and the proper >> solution to make separated (probably) optimized function for >> converting checksum to canonical string representation. But this is >> def