[CC'ing users@]
On Sunday, August 10, 2014 08:35:44 PM Ben Reser wrote:
> > Also, I think it would be a good idea to have the transaction-modifying
> > functions return an error once the transaction reached the stage of
> > pre-commit hooks from functions like svn_fs_change_node_prop() - to avoid
Side note this is in the pre-commit.tmpl that we create when you create a
repository:
[[[
# *** NOTE: THE HOOK PROGRAM MUST NOT MODIFY THE TXN, EXCEPT ***
# *** FOR REVISION PROPERTIES (like svn:log or svn:author). ***
]]]
On 8/10/14 7:36 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> So, the unversioned pr
Thanks Ben for a detailed answer. A few follow-up questions below:
On Sunday, August 10, 2014 06:21:04 PM Ben Reser wrote:
[... snip ...]
> Here's the most important sentence form the book:
>
> "While hook scripts can do almost anything, there is one dimension in which
> hook script authors shoul
On 8/10/14 5:19 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> - First, if the fs.change_node_prop was not intended for use in scripts, why
> is
> it exposed in bindings at all?
Bindings are not intended just for writing hook scripts. Rather the bindings
are intended to wrap the entirety of our C API (though someti
On Monday, August 11, 2014 01:55:41 AM Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.08.2014 23:59, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 10, 2014 08:46:45 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:14:05AM -0700, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, August 09, 2014 10:50:11 PM Alexey Neyma
On 10.08.2014 21:17, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Aug 10 19:17:53 2014
> New Revision: 1617148
[...]
> @@ -973,7 +869,11 @@ add_complex_matches(lookup_state_t *stat
>for (i = 0; i < patterns->nelts; ++i)
> {
>node_t *node = APR_ARRAY_IDX(patterns, i, node
On 11.08.2014 01:38, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 08:08:21PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> The way to fix this is to make sure that the macro
>> SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK gives the correct answer; and it's OK if
>> that answer compiler-specific, not just platform-specific. In other
On 10.08.2014 23:59, Alexey Neyman wrote:
>
> On Sunday, August 10, 2014 08:46:45 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:14:05AM -0700, Alexey Neyman wrote:
>
> > > On Saturday, August 09, 2014 10:50:11 PM Alexey Neyman wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Subversion developers,
>
> > > >
>
> >
On 10.08.2014 22:26, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 10 August 2014 20:47, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 10.08.2014 13:00, i...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: ivan
>> Date: Sun Aug 10 11:00:39 2014
>> New Revision: 1617088
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617088
>> Log:
>> On svn-auth-x509 branch: Revert r
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 08:08:21PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 09.08.2014 15:55, Alan Modra wrote:
> > Using current git sources compiled with gcc-4.9.1 or mainline gcc at
> > -O3 results in failure of random-test.
> >
> > On powerpc64le we see
> > PASS: random-test 1: random delta test
> > sv
On Sunday, August 10, 2014 08:46:45 PM Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:14:05AM -0700, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 09, 2014 10:50:11 PM Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > > Hi Subversion developers,
> > >
> > > I am trying to migrate some scripts from 1.6 server that we'r
On 10 August 2014 20:47, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.08.2014 13:00, i...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: ivan
> Date: Sun Aug 10 11:00:39 2014
> New Revision: 1617088
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617088
> Log:
> On svn-auth-x509 branch: Revert r1616093 (svn_checksum_to_cstring_display2
> impleme
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:14:05AM -0700, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> On Saturday, August 09, 2014 10:50:11 PM Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > Hi Subversion developers,
> >
> > I am trying to migrate some scripts from 1.6 server that we're currently
> > running to a newer SVN version, and encountered somethin
On 8/10/14 7:35 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> There shouldn't be any such certificate that's valid (at least that's using
> the
> Internet profile for X.509). There are two places that the signature
> algorithm
> are specified in the certificate. First in the Certificate sequence and again
> in the TB
On 10.08.2014 18:57, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.08.2014 16:00, stef...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: stefan2
>> Date: Sun Aug 10 14:00:08 2014
>> New Revision: 1617108
> [...]
>> (has_matching_rule): Update to new data model - just iterate over all
>>ACEs and handle generi
On 10.08.2014 16:00, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Aug 10 14:00:08 2014
> New Revision: 1617108
[...]
> (has_matching_rule): Update to new data model - just iterate over all
>ACEs and handle generic ACEs as well.
Or just use svn_authz__acl_get_ac
On 10.08.2014 13:00, i...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Sun Aug 10 11:00:39 2014
> New Revision: 1617088
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617088
> Log:
> On svn-auth-x509 branch: Revert r1616093 (svn_checksum_to_cstring_display2
> implementation) -- it's out of the scope of svn-auth-x50
On Saturday, August 09, 2014 10:50:11 PM Alexey Neyman wrote:
> Hi Subversion developers,
>
> I am trying to migrate some scripts from 1.6 server that we're currently
> running to a newer SVN version, and encountered something that looks like
> a bug: with 1.7/1.8 the fs.change_node_prop (in Pytho
> -Original Message-
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl]
> Sent: donderdag 7 augustus 2014 19:40
> To: 'Ben Reser'; 'Subversion Development'
> Subject: RE: 1.7.18 up for testing/signing
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org]
> > Sent:
On 8/10/14 5:03 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> I agree svn_checksum_to_cstring_display() is wrong name and the proper
> solution to make separated (probably) optimized function for
> converting checksum to canonical string representation. But this is
> definitely out of scope of this branch. I've gone ah
On 8/9/14 7:10 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Voting stands now at 2 for Unix and 2 for Windows. Need one more vote from
> both camps. Reminder, in order to release on the 11th we need votes in by the
> 10th. So I'd really appreciate if we can get these votes in the next day.
With Branko's vote we're n
Hi Stefan,
> Thanks for having a the (missing) instance ID issue.
> From initial review, I have 1 objection and 2 issues
> that your patch does not address, yet.
Thank you for reviewing this patch. I did my best, but I cannot really tell,
which of these points are objections, and which of them a
On 7 August 2014 21:03, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 8/7/14 4:10 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> Several comments on branch code itself:
>> 1. Probably it makes sense to do not deprecate
>> svn_checksum_to_cstring_display() or have local x509 implementation
>> for fingerprint formatting because we use
>> svn_c
On 10 August 2014 15:34, wrote:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Sun Aug 10 11:34:16 2014
> New Revision: 1617096
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617096
> Log:
> On svn-auth-x509 branch:
>
> * subversion/include/svn_x509.h
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/x509.h
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/x509info.c
> * subvers
On 8 August 2014 21:24, Evgeny Kotkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a patch for the problem discussed in
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2014-04/0245.shtml
>
> Please see the details below.
>
> Log message:
> [[[
> Avoid shared data clashes between repositories duplicated using 'hotcop
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform
Mac OS X 10.9.4 Mavericks, build 13E28
Standard dependencies:
Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.4svn)
APR 1.4.5
APR-Util 1.3.12
zlib 1.2.5
httpd 2.2.24
Python 2.7.5
Perl 5.16.2
Rub
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform
Mac OS X 10.9.4 Mavericks, build 13E28
Standard dependencies:
Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.4svn)
APR 1.4.5
APR-Util 1.3.12
zlib 1.2.5
httpd 2.2.24
Python 2.7.5
Perl 5.16.2
Rub
27 matches
Mail list logo
