Thanks! Also, good point about reverse merges, I forgot all about that.
-Matt
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 22 June 2014 14:13, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I propose we start planning a serf 1.4 release.
>>
>> Serf trunk has some features that will be used in the upcoming
>> Subversion 1.9, so I'd like to get 1.4 out when the Subversio
On 26 June 2014 19:08, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 25 June 2014 22:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 20:03:11 +0400:
>> >> On 25 June 2014 19:54, Stefan Fuhrmann
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Jun
Using serf 1.3.x@2383 I see a SEGV after an HTTP timeout due to serf's
pool cleanups accessing memory after it has been released. I have a
post-commit script that takes longer than the client's http-timeout and
I see this:
valgrind -q subversion/svn/.libs/lt-svn import -mm repo/format
http://loc
Matt Phipps wrote:
> Hi dev list,
>
> I saw a section in
> https://wiki.apache.org/subversion/SupportedMergeScenarios saying
> about non-tracked merges: "### WHICH MERGES ARE THESE? WHEN ARE THEY
> APPROPRIATE? WHEN DO THEY HAPPEN SILENTLY?"
>
> A merge like that would make sense if you wanted to
5 matches
Mail list logo