Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 20:33:42 +0200:
> Why would someone quote the 7b/8b encoding scheme docs if not to use
> it *against* the current code?
To bring enough context into the discussion so that people who haven't
read the f7 design docs may participate in it.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 17:34:43 +0200:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >
> > > Subversion 1.8 and before in general uses human readable decimal
> > > format to store numbers in FSFS repositor
Hi Stefan.
Compared with the extent of what you have achieved, this is a minor thing, so I
don't want to go on about it much.
However the point about readable code is not just whether it will need to be
changed within the lifetime of "format 7" deployments, but about whether other
software eng
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 18:03:24 +:
> > Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 17:34:43 +0200:
> > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ivan Zhakov
> wrote:
> > > > Log addressing
> > > > implementation on trunk
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 20:03:11 +0400:
> On 25 June 2014 19:54, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25 June 2014 19:24, Stefan Fuhrmann
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> >>
> >>
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 18:03:24 +:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 17:34:43 +0200:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > > Log addressing
> > > implementation on trunk introduces new encoding for storing numbers in
> > > indexes. Quoti
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 17:34:43 +0200:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
> > Subversion 1.8 and before in general uses human readable decimal
> > format to store numbers in FSFS repositories on disk.
>
>
> True. However, there are exceptions to that
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Julian Foad
wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>
> > Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >> @@ -1449,15 +1449,35 @@ write_revision_zero(svn_fs_t *fs)
> >>>+SVN_ERR(svn_io_file_create_binary(path_revision_zero,
> >>>+ "PLAIN\nEND\nENDREP\n"
> >>>+
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> @@ -1449,15 +1449,35 @@ write_revision_zero(svn_fs_t *fs)
>>>+ SVN_ERR(svn_io_file_create_binary(path_revision_zero,
>>>+ "PLAIN\nEND\nENDREP\n"
>>>+ "id: 0.0.r0/2\n"
>>>+ "type: dir\n"
>>>+
On 25 June 2014 19:54, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 25 June 2014 19:24, Stefan Fuhrmann
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 21 June 2014 17:15, wrote:
>> >> > Author: stefan2
>> >> > Date: S
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 25 June 2014 19:24, Stefan Fuhrmann
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> >>
> >> On 21 June 2014 17:15, wrote:
> >> > Author: stefan2
> >> > Date: Sat Jun 21 15:15:30 2014
> >> > New Revision: 1604421
> >>
On 25 June 2014 19:24, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2014 17:15, wrote:
>> > Author: stefan2
>> > Date: Sat Jun 21 15:15:30 2014
>> > New Revision: 1604421
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1604421
>> > Log:
>> > Append index d
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Subversion 1.8 and before in general uses human readable decimal
> format to store numbers in FSFS repositories on disk.
True. However, there are exceptions to that general rule.
The index data uses the same basic encoding as we
already use
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 21 June 2014 17:15, wrote:
> > Author: stefan2
> > Date: Sat Jun 21 15:15:30 2014
> > New Revision: 1604421
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1604421
> > Log:
> > Append index data to the rev data file instead of using separate files.
>
Subversion 1.8 and before in general uses human readable decimal
format to store numbers in FSFS repositories on disk. Log addressing
implementation on trunk introduces new encoding for storing numbers in
indexes. Quoting log addressing indexes format documentation [1]
[[[
Encoding
The fi
On 21 June 2014 17:15, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sat Jun 21 15:15:30 2014
> New Revision: 1604421
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1604421
> Log:
> Append index data to the rev data file instead of using separate files.
>
> This gives unpacked FSFS format 7 similar I/O characteristics and d
Philip Martin writes:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> I'm getting a SEGV in the JVM and it varies from run to run, two
>> examples at the end. I tried r1603298 and r1603297 and those also SEGV.
>
> Looks like I made a mistake when building the older versions. I am now
> seeing the SEGV with r1603
Philip Martin writes:
> I'm getting a SEGV in the JVM and it varies from run to run, two
> examples at the end. I tried r1603298 and r1603297 and those also SEGV.
Looks like I made a mistake when building the older versions. I am now
seeing the SEGV with r1603306 but not with r1603305 or earli
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:21:49 +0200:
> On 23.06.2014 10:54, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >
> >> One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after
> >> finishing it. Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before
> >> starting
> >>
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:54:46 +0100:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after
> > finishing it. Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before starting
> > to edit a file, and later got conflicts
> >
> > Both
Neels Hofmeyr wrote on Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 00:59:33 +0200:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:06:22AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > One of my colleagues ran bisect but forgot to update back to HEAD after
> > finishing it. Another forgot to run 'svn up' in the morning before starting
> > to edit a fil
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 24.06.2014 21:48, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> For some time the JavaHL tests on the svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc have been
>> segfaulting.
>>
>> Looking at
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc?numbuilds=200
>>
>> It appears this bot started failing after e
22 matches
Mail list logo
