Translation status report for trunk@r1603051
lang trans untrans fuzzy obs
--
de2715 60 215 471 +++~~~
es2227 548 788 528 ++U~~~
fr2527 248
bre...@tigris.org wrote on Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:51:08 -0700:
> The plan at this point is to leave format 7 in 1.9.x. With the following work
> steps to be completed prior to release.
>
> 1. live check of low level checksum.
> 2. run test suite with previous formats
> 3. validate performance is
s...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 14:11:18 -:
> -#ifdef PACK_AFTER_EVERY_COMMIT
Should we make it an #error for PACK_AFTER_EVERY_COMMIT to be defined?
(in order to forcibly break any scripts that use the #define and expect it
to have an effect)
Daniel
Stefan Sperling writes:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:53:16PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> Stefan2 pointed out that format 7 is less efficient if packing is disabled.
>> So to fully benefit from format 7 in the default configuration, users must
>> currently run 'svnadmin pack' or edit fsfs.con
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:53:16PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Stefan2 pointed out that format 7 is less efficient if packing is disabled.
> So to fully benefit from format 7 in the default configuration, users must
> currently run 'svnadmin pack' or edit fsfs.conf to enable packing after
> co
Hi,
I'm not sure how to update my branch because the underlying base has
changed(and doesn't merge all that well) and thus, I restarted with
just a patch and a copy of the current trunk.
So, just to keep things simple, I just post it as a patch for now.
Gabriela
Ps.: I'll take a look at the --
Stefan2 pointed out that format 7 is less efficient if packing is disabled.
So to fully benefit from format 7 in the default configuration, users must
currently run 'svnadmin pack' or edit fsfs.conf to enable packing after commit.
Since format 7 adds locking support to pack, so it should be safe to
7 matches
Mail list logo
