Johan Corveleyn writes:
> Not much interest it seems. Filed an issue, so this doesn't get forgotten:
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4504
>
> I don't have the time nor expertise right now to work on this, but if
> someone else wants to have a go ... by all means.
Simi
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> If the file with the cached credentials (the file under > config dir>/auth/svn.simple) is read-only, 'svn' 1.8 (on Windows) will
>> behave as follows after a password change:
>>
>>
On 5/20/14, 12:21 PM, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> The goal is to permit us to use a different translation model, where
> translators aren't working directly in the SVN tree but on .pot files or
> source
> distributions that we give them.
>
> The Translation Project, which I'd like to try first, wo
20 maj 2014 kl. 17.57 skrev Ben Reser:
Why should the pot file be present in the distribution package?
Shouldn't
translators be working against a SVN checkout and not a distribution
package?
The goal is to permit us to use a different translation model, where
translators aren't working d
On 5/6/14, 2:52 PM, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
> Translators will need the subversion.pot file; it should be present in the
> source distribution. Presumably, the right way to ensure that is to have
> dist.sh generate it, similar to the way the configure script is created.
>
> [[[
> Have dist.sh gen
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 03:25:39PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> Hi, folks.
>
> At last I have a plan for move tracking. I want to share this plan and get
> your feedback.
I'm delighted to hear this! :)
> I want to start implementing it, but first Philip suggested, and I agree,
> we should do a mo
Hi, folks.
At last I have a plan for move tracking. I want to share this plan and get
your feedback.
I want to start implementing it, but first Philip suggested, and I agree,
we should do a mock-up and see how the high-level behaviour pans out in
typical scenarios involving moves, especially merg
On 16 May 2014 21:27, Ben Reser wrote:
[]
> To that end I'd like to branch no later than June 13th. Please figure out
> what
> blockers you have on a 1.9.0 release and have them appropriately flagged in
> the
> issue tracker by May 23rd. I'd like to see us having a decision on what we're
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote:
> > [...] I suggest that we need to start moving towards a 1.9.x branch.
> >
> > We'd planned to defer new development and concentrate on fixes before our
> > branch point [...] I propose that we start that period now. [...]
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann, can you make a decision on Issue #4146:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4146
>
> Does that still need doing?
>
It hasn't been done but I a hard look at the code and it turned
out to be infeasible without
10 matches
Mail list logo
