Re: svn commit: r1582438 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/svn_test_main.c

On 27.03.2014 19:42, rhuij...@apache.org wrote: > Author: rhuijben > Date: Thu Mar 27 18:42:30 2014 > New Revision: 1582438 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1582438 > Log: > * subversion/tests/svn_test_main.c > (thread_local): Remove __GNUC__ check in an attempt to fix compilation > on OpenBSD

Re: Review of lock-many API [was: svn commit: r1577280 [1/3] ...]

I (Julian Foad) wrote: > In principle, the 'is_dav_comment' and 'expiration_date' > parameters should similarly be per target, Not "should", but rather "could be argued, at some pedantic level". > but that makes less sense in practice > as they're only used for generic DAV clients via mod_dav_s

Review of lock-many API [was: svn commit: r1577280 [1/3] ...]

Philip Martin wrote: > Julian Foad writes: >>>  URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1577280 >>>  * subversion/include/svn_fs.h >>>    (svn_fs_lock_target_t, svn_fs_lock_result_t, >>>     svn_fs_lock2, svn_fs_unlock2): new. >>> >>>  * subversion/include/svn_repos.h >>>    (svn_repos_fs_lock2, svn_repos_fs_