Ben Reser writes:
> The 1.9.0-alpha2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Is it worth stripping tools/buildbot from the tarball? The files are no
real use in the tarball but they are not very big either, perhaps 12KB
in the tarball and 248KB unpacked.
--
Philip Martin | Su
Ben Reser writes:
> Index: subversion/libsvn_client/locking_commands.c
> ===
> --- subversion/libsvn_client/locking_commands.c (revision 1579078)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_client/locking_commands.c (working copy)
> @@ -294,6 +294,12 @@
On 3/18/14, 2:18 PM, Fergus Slorach wrote:
> In Subversion 1.6 'svn lock ' in a read-only workspace fails as expected
> and no lock is created either in the workspace or in the repository.
>
> In Svn 1.7/1.8 'svn lock ' still fails, but it creates a repository-side
> lock (see below). Is this a re
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Ben Reser writes:
>
> > On 3/4/14, 1:23 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> >> The 1.9.0-alpha2 release artifacts are now available for
> testing/signing.
> >> Please get the tarballs from
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> >> an
Ben Reser writes:
> On 3/4/14, 1:23 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> The 1.9.0-alpha2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>> Please get the tarballs from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>> and add your signatures there. There's no particular schedule to this it
Bert Huijben wrote on Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 19:42:29 +0100:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> > Sent: dinsdag 18 maart 2014 19:32
> > To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: client side workaround for svnserve iprops bug
> >
> > ph
Hi,
In Subversion 1.6 'svn lock ' in a read-only workspace fails as expected
and no lock is created either in the workspace or in the repository.
In Svn 1.7/1.8 'svn lock ' still fails, but it creates a repository-side
lock (see below). Is this a regression or was the change intentional?
> svn
On 3/18/14, 9:52 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> I get one failure when testing with FSX:
>
> [[[
> svn_tests: E160057: Node revision index 26 exceeds container size 26
> FAIL: fs-x-pack-test.exe 3: read from a packed FSX filesystem
> ]]]
>
> Anyone else seeing this?
Look the same as this to me:
h
Hello,
On 18/03/14 02:49, rvaedex23 wrote:
> I am trying to copy a repository to another location.
> Example
> copy
>
> /export/svn/repo1
>
> to
>
> /export/svn/repo2/code/documents/repo1
> how can this be done in Linux?
For usage questions, please contact the us...@subversion.apache
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 18 maart 2014 19:32
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: client side workaround for svnserve iprops bug
>
> phi...@apache.org writes:
>
> > Author: philip
> > Date: Tue Mar 18 12:57:22 2
phi...@apache.org writes:
> Author: philip
> Date: Tue Mar 18 12:57:22 2014
> New Revision: 1578853
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1578853
> Log:
> Make svnserve recognise when the client does not want inherited
> properties. This fixes a performance problem with 1.8 servers
> sending too much d
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> On 3/4/14, 1:23 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> The 1.9.0-alpha2 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>>> Please get the tarballs from
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/d
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 18 maart 2014 11:37
> To: 'Subversion Development'
> Subject: Re: Subversion checked-out files not indexed in Windows search
>
> On 18.03.2014 11:20, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > But the reason we set this fla
On 18.03.2014 11:20, Bert Huijben wrote:
> But the reason we set this flag is mostly gone anyway... I think we should
> just remove our code to touch that attribute and use the apr attribute
> function like we did before. The additional indexing is not really our
> problem (and the indexer won't
> -Original Message-
> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 18 maart 2014 11:07
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: Branko Čibej; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: Subversion checked-out files not indexed in Windows search
>
> On 13 March 2014 17:14, Bert Huijben wrote
On 13 March 2014 17:14, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:i...@visualsvn.com]
>> Sent: donderdag 13 maart 2014 13:56
>> To: Branko Čibej
>> Cc: Subversion Development
>> Subject: Re: Subversion checked-out files not indexed in Windows search
>>
>> O
16 matches
Mail list logo
