On 2/27/14, 2:04 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 2/27/14, 12:55 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> Sure. Part of the reason to do an alpha is to get feedback on new features,
>>> particularly UI feedback. The auth subcommand happens to be one of those
>>> features that I think we could use user input on. If
On 3/2/14, 5:34 PM, Leo Davis wrote:
> As Ben pointed out, the current parser in the script for svnlook <= 1.7.x is
> broken and unfixable for multiline properties. The closest we can get to
> DTRT in this case is to have svnlook output XML. Hopefully no one still
> cares about svnlook <= 1.3
Hello,
As Ben pointed out, the current parser in the script for svnlook <= 1.7.x is
broken and unfixable for multiline properties. The closest we can get to DTRT
in this case is to have svnlook output XML. Hopefully no one still cares about
svnlook <= 1.3 (?) that cannot output XML.
Regards,
Failed to build Revision: 1573411.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> There is a problem with the FNV1a checksums in format 7: the on-disk
> representation for big-endian systems, like SPARC, is different from
> that of little-endian systems, like x86. Both systems calculate the
> same checksum value, however t
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> > I've got a slightly different stack but it seems to be
> > the same problem. Took me a while to trace down
> > the root cause. r1573237 should fix it.
>
> I'm still seeing one of the warnings:
>
> $ subversion/sv
Should be fixed in r2316.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Stefan Kueng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's a crash happening in libsvn_ra_serf\util.c in the function
> svn_ra_serf__credentials_callback. There's a full crash dump available from
> here:
> https://www.crash-server.com/Problem.aspx?ClientID=ts
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> I've got a slightly different stack but it seems to be
> the same problem. Took me a while to trace down
> the root cause. r1573237 should fix it.
I'm still seeing one of the warnings:
$ subversion/svnadmin/svnadmin create repo3 --fs-type fsx
$ rm -rf repo3/db/format
$
Ben Reser wrote on Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 19:07:37 -0800:
> On 2/25/14, 4:21 PM, Leo Davis wrote:
> > I recently discovered that the old 'check-mime-type.pl' contrib script is I
> > had installed on my server was broken when using subversion 1.8.5. I
> > looked
> > for an updated script in the 1.
Branko Čibej writes:
> "int main(void)" is not equivalent to "int main()" in C; it is in C++.
These are compatible
int foo(void);
int foo(){...}
however main is special so I suppose 'int main(){...}' might be
compatible but not equivalent, or I suppose compatiblity may be
irrelevant and it
On 02.03.2014 03:56, Philip Martin wrote:
> Branko Čibej writes:
>
>> On 02.03.2014 03:15, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> I have no problem with your change but I don't believe a compiler would
>>> reject 'int main()'. The standard explicitly allows declarations
>>> "equivalent" to the two declarations
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Update:
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Stefan Kueng wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There's a crash happening in libsvn_ra_serf\util.c in the function
>>> svn_ra_serf__cre
12 matches
Mail list logo