Re: Moves in FSFS

Branko Čibej wrote: > On 17.09.2013 13:12, Julian Foad wrote: >>  But why does "move" need to create a new node-revision of the >> moved node itself (assuming the node isn't lazy-copied and isn't about >> to be modified).  Why shouldn't it just create a new reference to the >> existing old node-

Re: Definition of Node-Line-ID

Branko Čibej wrote: > Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> Branko Čibej wrote: >>> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: After two hours of analysis, it seems that I have found the correct definition for the "node line ID" as required by Julian's move API design Hi Stefan. Thanks.  I agree your definition s

Re: Moves in FSFS

On 17.09.2013 13:12, Julian Foad wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 17.09.2013 12:46, Philip Martin wrote: >>> I still don't understand. For a change like a text edit we always call >>> make-mutable and it always gives a new id, either changing the >>> revision-id or the copy-id. It's not c

Re: Moves in FSFS

Branko Čibej wrote: > On 17.09.2013 12:46, Philip Martin wrote: >>  I still don't understand.  For a change like a text edit we always call >>  make-mutable and it always gives a new id, either changing the >>  revision-id or the copy-id.  It's not clear to me that there should be >>  a make-mutab

Re: Moves in FSFS

On 17.09.2013 12:46, Philip Martin wrote: > Branko Čibej writes: > >> On 13.09.2013 11:32, Philip Martin wrote: >>> Branko Čibej writes: >>> >>> There is another aspect to the lazy-copy which is when does the new >>> copy-id get assigned to the lazy children. If we commit >>> >>>move A/f A/g

Re: Moves in FSFS

>> Branko Čibej writes: >>> That said, I still do not understand why a different ID would be needed >>> before the copy-on-write happens. Is it because the client doesn't have >>> the full history available? [...] Hi Brane. Ref.

RE: Regression in 1.8.x - checksum mismatch when using svn via http/apache

Hi, If everybody could reproduce this as easy as you describe here we probably had this fixed years ago. As I can’t check your specific server setup I will try to help you by just guessing. I’m guessing that this is the ‘zlib’ problem we finally identified last week. Can

Re: Moves in FSFS

Branko Čibej writes: > On 13.09.2013 11:32, Philip Martin wrote: >> Branko Čibej writes: >> >> There is another aspect to the lazy-copy which is when does the new >> copy-id get assigned to the lazy children. If we commit >> >>move A/f A/g >> >> then move does not allocate a new copy-id and

Regression in 1.8.x - checksum mismatch when using svn via http/apache

Hi there, when updating to current svn version 1.8.x I spotted a regression. Used environment: On client side: - Windows 7 SP1 Ultimate 64bit - SlikSVN 1.8.0 (also tested with SlikSVN 1.8.3 and TortoiseSVN 1.8.3 - all behave the same) - 64Bit Version - Also tried Sli